Project Activities
Structured Abstract
Setting
Sample
Research design and methods
Control condition
Key measures
Data analytic strategy
People and institutions involved
IES program contact(s)
Products and publications
Products: The expected outcomes from this project include publications and presentations on the findings of the two studies, along with manuals, coaching evaluation rubrics, and other materials needed to implement the Partnership Instructional Coaching model.
Book
Knight, J. (2011). Unmistakable Impact: A Partnership Approach for Dramatically Improving Instruction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
Knight, J. (2013). High-Impact Instruction: A Framework for Great Teaching. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Knight, J. (2014). Focus on Teaching: Using Video for High-Impact Instruction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Knight, J. (2015). Better Conversations: Coaching Ourselves and Each Other to be More Credible, Caring, and Connected. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Journal article, monograph, or newsletter
Fullan, M., and Knight, J. (2011). Coaches as System Leaders. Educational Leadership, 69(2): 50-53.
Knight, J. (2014). What You Learn When You See Yourself Teach. Educational Leadership, 71(8): 18-23.
Knight, J., and Nieuwerburgh, C. (2012). Instructional Coaching: A Focus on Practice. Coaching: An International Journal of Theory, Research and Practice, 5(2): 100-112. doi:10.1080/17521882.2012.707668
Knight, J., Bradley, B., Hock, M., Skrtic, T., Knight, D., Brasseur-Hock., I., Clark, J., Ruggles, M., and Hatton, C. (2012). Record, Replay, Reflect: Videotaped Lessons Accelerate Learning for Teachers and Coaches. Journal of Staff Development, 33(2): 18-23.
Knight, J., Elford, M., Hock, M., Dunekack, D., Bradley, B., Deshler, D., and Knight, D. (2015). 3 Steps to Great Coaching: A Simple but Powerful Instructional Coaching Cycle Nets Results. Journal of Staff Development, 36(1): 10-16.
Wanzek, J., Vaughn, S., Scammacca, N., Gatlin, B., Walker, M., and Capin, P. (2016). Meta-Analyses of the Effects of Tier 2 Type Reading Interventions in Grades K-3. Educational Psychology Review, 28(3): 551-576. doi:10.1007/s10648-015-9321-7
Working paper
Beglau, M., Craig-Hare, J., Foltos, L., Gann, K., James, J., Jobe, H., Knight, J., and Smith, B. (2011). Technology, Coaching and Community: Power Partners for Improved Professional Development in Primary and Secondary Education. Eugene, OR: ISTE .
Supplemental information
Purpose: The No Child Left Behind Act sets a challenging goal of having all students, including students with disabilities, achieve proficiency in reading and mathematics by 2014. Schools and districts are held accountable for making adequate progress toward proficiency for all students and subgroups, and the performance of students with disabilities is often cited as a particular challenge for schools in achieving annual proficiency targets. Research has identified a number of teaching practices which may accelerate academic progress for students with disabilities, but professional development research has lagged behind in identifying methods for facilitating teachers' professional learning so they can adopt research-based practices on a widespread and ongoing basis. The researchers on this project will develop and evaluate a teacher training model called the Partnership Instructional Coaching model for improving instruction and achievement for students with disabilities. This model will incorporate a number of practices that have been demonstrated to promote professional learning in teachers, such as (a) one-to-one non-evaluative partnership relationships between a coach and teacher, (b) empirically proven teaching practices, (c) modeling by coaches in teachers classrooms, (d) observation of teachers by coaches in teachers' classrooms, (e) collaborative discussions about teaching practices, model lessons, teachers' lessons, and (f) ongoing support (modeling, observation, collaborative discussion) until teachers' use of new practices is fluent and habitual.
The following teacher-level measures will be used: (1) Instruments developed during project year one to measure teachers' attitudes toward and knowledge of evidence-based practices; (2) Surveys and observations to measure teachers' implementation of their designated models (e.g., assessment of Partnership Instructional Coaching).
Questions about this project?
To answer additional questions about this project or provide feedback, please contact the program officer.