Key outcomes
First, the team found that students’ metacomprehension accuracy is increased when students access the situation models that they create during reading. This mental representation allows students to identify what they do and do not understand during and after reading. However, the research of this team elaborates how students do not always access their situation models prior to making metacomprehension judgments. The research completed to address this outcome also discovered that at-risk readers use different (and less effective) tools to calibrate their understanding. Specifically, at-risk readers rely on surface features to make metacomprehension assessments. When at-risk readers were directed to use features other than surface features (through generating keywords at a delay, for example), their metacomprehension accuracy improved.
The second set of research studies addressed what types of instructional manipulations should be used in order to improve metacomprehension accuracy. The major finding from this series of studies is that asking students to generate keywords that summarize the gist of what was just read after a delay is one powerful way to improve metacomprehension accuracy for all readers. In addition, the studies found that other tasks which require students to generate information about a text recently read after a delay can assist metacomprehension accuracy. Self-explanation is another demonstrated technique that improves metacomprehension accuracy. Finally, the use of concept mapping while reading expository texts was effective for at-risk college readers, but did not improve the metacomprehension accuracy ratings of normal college readers.
Finally, the research team has developed a new set of techniques that were not originally proposed, but which hold promise for fostering metacomprehension accuracy. This technique entails giving readers practice with test questions that require inference generation. This then seems to force readers to generate their own situation models. This line of research was continued in their subsequent Cognition and Student Learning award.
People and institutions involved
IES program contact(s)
Project contributors
Products and publications
Publications:
ERIC Citations: Find available citations in ERIC for this award here.
Select Publications:
Book chapters
Thiede, K.W., Griffin, T.D., Wiley, J., and Redford, J.S. (2009). Metacognitive Monitoring During and After Reading. In D.J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, and A.C. Graesser (Eds.), Handbook of Metacognition in Education (pp. 85-106). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Journal articles
Dunlosky, J., and Thiede, K.W. (2004). Causes and Constraints of the Shift-to-Easier-Materials Effect in the Control of Study. Memory and Cognition, 32: 779-788.
Dunlosky, J., Hertzog, C., Kennedy, M., and Thiede, K. (2005). The Self-Monitoring Approach for Effective Learning. Cognitive Technology, 10: 4-11.
Griffin, T.D., Wiley, J., and Thiede, K.W. (2008). Individual Differences, Rereading, and Self-Explanation: Concurrent Processing and Cue Validity as Constraints on Metacomprehension Accuracy. Memory and Cognition, 36(1): 93-103.
Ricks, T., and Wiley, J. (2009). The Influence of Domain Knowledge on the Functional Capacity of Working Memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 61(4): 519-537.
Sanchez, C.A., Wiley, J., Miura, T.K., Colflesh, G.H., Ricks, T.R., Jensen, M.S., and Conway, A.A. (2010). Assessing Working Memory Capacity in a Non-Native Language. Learning and Individual Differences, 20(5): 488-493.
Thiede, K.W., Dunlosky, J., Griffin, T.D., and Wiley, J. (2005). Understanding the Delayed-Keyword Effect on Metacomprehension Accuracy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 31(6): 1267-1280.
Thiede, K.W., Griffin, T.D., Wiley, J., and Anderson, M. (2010). Poor Metacomprehension Accuracy as a Result of Inappropriate Cue Use. Discourse Processes: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 47(4): 331-362.
Trabasso, T., and Wiley, J. (2009). What Happens at Reunions? Exploring Causal Connections and Their Role in Reunion Effects. Discourse Processes, 46(4): 269-308.
Wiley, J., Goldman, S.R., Graesser, A.C., Sanchez, C.A., Ash, I.K., and Hemmerich, J.A. (2009). Source Evaluation, Comprehension, and Learning in Internet Science Inquiry Tasks. American Educational Research Journal, 46(4): 1060-1106.
Wiley, J., Griffin, T.D., and Thiede, K.W. (2005). Putting the Comprehension in Metacomprehension. Journal of General Psychology, 132: 408-428.
Proceedings
Jee, B., Wiley, J., and Griffin, T.D. (2006). Expertise and the Illusion of Comprehension. In Proceedings of the 28th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Related projects
Questions about this project?
To answer additional questions about this project or provide feedback, please contact the program officer.