Skip to main content

Breadcrumb

Home arrow_forward_ios Information on IES-Funded Research arrow_forward_ios Making Sense of Concrete Models for ...
Home arrow_forward_ios ... arrow_forward_ios Making Sense of Concrete Models for ...
Information on IES-Funded Research
Grant Closed

Making Sense of Concrete Models for Mathematics

NCER
Program: Education Research Grants
Program topic(s): Cognition and Student Learning
Award amount: $1,319,945
Principal investigator: Kelly Mix
Awardee:
Michigan State University
Year: 2008
Award period: 4 years (08/16/2008 - 08/15/2012)
Project type:
Development and Innovation
Award number: R305A080287

Purpose

To help children connect their intuitive understanding of mathematics to related symbolic procedures, some educational theorists have advocated for the use of concrete models during instruction. Current theories identify several mechanisms that might be engaged by concrete models for mathematics. These models are meant to embody mathematical relationships more transparently than everyday objects. For example, to teach place value concepts, a set of beads may be used to illustrate the relations among ones, tens, hundreds, and thousands. These objects are different from the objects children are likely to encounter in their day-to-day activities and in that sense, may be less grounded in everyday experience. Yet, the objects are hypothesized to provide a way to directly experience place value relations that is lacking in written symbols. Concrete models are implemented in many different ways based on a range of variation along several dimensions. The goal of this project is to develop and document the feasibility of an intervention based on the use of concrete models to teach mathematics. Specifically, the research team is investigating the conditions under which concrete models support learning based on the cognitive mechanisms they might engage. The project focuses on the acquisition of place value concepts in the early elementary grades because this is a well-known challenge for young learners and one that interferes with the subsequent acquisition of more complex algorithms and concepts.

Project Activities

In this project, the research team will conduct six experiments designed to examine the effects of various instructional approaches of using math manipulatives on the cognitive mechanisms these approaches might engage. In each experiment, rising first graders will be randomly assigned to either the control condition or to one of multiple experimental conditions. By manipulating factors such as amount of direct contact, length of exposure, teacher-directed structure, exposure to written algorithms, numbers of models, and models that elicit different actions, the project seeks to determine not only whether manipulatives work but under what conditions they do and why, at a process level. Children's learning of multi-digit calculation problems, as well as place value, will be measured in both conditions.

Structured Abstract

Setting

Researchers will organize and offer summer camps and after-school programs for recruiting and testing participants in two ethnically diverse mid-size Midwestern cities (Michigan and Indiana).

Sample

Study participants include approximately 400 rising first graders who reflect the demographic diversity of the research setting, both in terms of race and socioeconomic status. Twenty-four children, with approximately equal numbers of boys and girls, will participate in each of the proposed conditions of each experiment.

Intervention

Guided by current cognitive theory related to symbol grounding, the research team will identify the instructional practices for teaching place value and multi-digit calculation with base-10 models, such as place value blocks, Montessori beads, and trading chips. Participating children will attend the instructional program for 2 hours every day over a period of 3 weeks. Although the proposed intervention is not aimed at creating new teaching materials or activities, researchers will generate a solid theoretical and empirical basis for implementing concrete models that already exist.

Research design and methods

Using the same general method across six experiments, researchers will examine under what conditions base-10 models support learning. Experiments use a pre-test—intervention—post-test design, in which the pre-test and post-tests are equivalent (though not identical) and the type of instruction that children receive is manipulated. Researchers will recruit children by organizing and offering summer math camps and after-school programs. Factors to be manipulated include amount of direct contact, length of exposure, teacher-directed structure, exposure to written algorithms, numbers of models, and models that elicit different actions. In Experiment 1, for example, children will be randomly assigned to either an experimental condition (concrete place value blocks; virtual place value blocks; or, teacher demonstration only with no direct contact for students) or to a control condition (in which children are taught and will practice written algorithms only). Children will be pulled out in small groups (5–10 students) for brief (30 minutes), daily training sessions across 12 weeks. Using an iterative design, subsequent experiments will be based on these outcomes; and, this process of iteration will be repeated as subsequent experiments build on results from previous experiments.

Control condition

Conditions for each of the six experiments depend on the research question posed, as follows: In Experiment 1, researchers compare the performance of children taught with place value blocks to those taught only the written algorithms. In Experiment 2, children either solve multi-digit calculation problems with full access to the blocks during practice or solve written algorithms only. In Experiment 3, students are provided unlimited access to materials while others only use the materials for teacher-sanctioned activities. In Experiment 4, children either receive the blocks only, written algorithms only, one before the other, or simultaneously. In Experiment 5 students either receive one model, multiple models in random order, or multiple models that decrease in concreteness. Finally, in Experiment 6, effects of different types of concrete models on students—place value blocks, Montessori beads, and interlocking blocks—are examined.

Key measures

The same outcome measure will be used across all six experiments and conditions and will consist of randomly generated multi-digit calculation problems, as well as place value items drawn from standardized tests, textbook tests, and previous research. Researchers will also collect and code videotapes of student behaviors observed during each experiment.

Data analytic strategy

Standard analysis of variance techniques will be used to compare student outcomes across experimental conditions.

People and institutions involved

IES program contact(s)

Elizabeth Albro

Elizabeth Albro

Commissioner of Education Research
NCER

Project contributors

Linda B. Smith

Co-principal investigator

Products and publications

The products of this project are published reports detailing a set of experimental data that identifies not only whether concrete math manipulatives work but under what conditions these models support learning based on the cognitive mechanisms they might engage. Other products include coded videotapes of child-controlled variables that demonstrate the way children use and act upon materials during training.

Publications:

Mix, K. S. (2010). Spatial tools for mathematical thought. In K. S. Mix, L.B. Smith & M. Gasser (Eds.) The Spatial Foundations of Language and Cognition, New York: Oxford University Press.

Byrge, L. Smith, L.B., & Mix, K.S. (2014). Beginnings of place value: How preschoolers write three-digit numbers. Child Development, 85 (2), 437-443. doi:10.1111/cdev.12162.

Mix, K. S., Prather, R. W., Smith, L. B., & Stockton, J. D. (2014). Young children's interpretations of multi-digit number names: From emerging competence to mastery. Child Development, 85v (3), 1306-1319. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12197

Mix, K. S., Smith, L. B., Stockton, J. D., Cheng, Y.L., & Barterian, J. A. (2016). Grounding the symbols for place value: Evidence from training and long-term exposure to base-10 models. Journal of Cognition and Development, 18(1), 129-151. doi: 10.1080/15248372.2016.1180296

Yuan, L., Prather, R., Mix, K. S., & Smith, L.B. (2019) Preschoolers and multi-digit numbers: A path to mathematics through symbols themselves. Cognition, 189 (1), 89-104. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2019.03.013

Yuan, L., Prather, R., Mix, K. S., & Smith, L. B. (2020). Number representations drive number-line estimations. Child Development, 91 (4), e952-e967.

Related projects

Applied Spatial Training for Elementary Mathematics

R305A220291

Questions about this project?

To answer additional questions about this project or provide feedback, please contact the program officer.

 

Tags

CognitionK-12 EducationMathematics

Share

Icon to link to Facebook social media siteIcon to link to X social media siteIcon to link to LinkedIn social media siteIcon to copy link value

Questions about this project?

To answer additional questions about this project or provide feedback, please contact the program officer.

 

You may also like

Zoomed in Yellow IES Logo
Grant

Longitudinal Relations Among Social Contexts, Bull...

Award number: R305A230406
Read More
Zoomed in IES logo
Request for Applications

Education Research and Development Center Program ...

March 14, 2025
Read More
Zoomed in IES logo
Data file

2022‒23 Common Core of Data (CCD) Dropouts Public-...

Data owner(s): Chen-Su Chen
Publication number: NCES 2024253
Read More
icon-dot-govicon-https icon-quote