Skip to main content

Breadcrumb

Home arrow_forward_ios Information on ... arrow_forward_ios The National Ce ...
Home arrow_forward_ios ... arrow_forward_ios The National Ce ...
Information on ...
Cooperative agreement Closed

The National Center for Research on Education Access and Choice

NCER
Program: Education Research and Development Centers
Program topic(s): Innovation in Education Reform , State and Local Policy
Award amount: $9,998,565
Principal investigator: Douglas N. Harris
Awardee:
Tulane University
Year: 2018
Award period: 7 years (09/01/2018 - 08/31/2025)
Project type:
Exploration, Other
Award number: R305C180025

Purpose

Across the U.S., many students have opportunities to attend schools other than their own traditional neighborhood public schools. These opportunities are commonly referred to as “school choice” and include such practices as open enrollment (both intra- and inter-district), magnet schools, charter schools including virtual schools, and public financial supports for attending private schools (e.g., vouchers, tax credit funded scholarships, education savings accounts, personal tax credits and deductions). Forty-seven states have laws allowing and funding charter schools, and another 26 states have voucher or tuition tax credit policies. To date, the evidence on the effects of various choice programs on student education outcomes is mixed, raising questions about whether current choice options can make a major contribution to the improvement of education outcomes for disadvantaged students. The National Center for Research on Education Access and Choice (REACH Center) carried out an extensive set of studies to inform how states and school districts may implement or revise their school choice programs and policies in ways that improve outcomes for disadvantaged students, including low-income, underrepresented minority, special education, and English Language Learner (ELL) students.

Project Activities

Focused program of research

The REACH Center completed two central activities, carrying out a set of 48 quantitative and qualitative studies and developing the National Longitudinal School Database (NLSD). Through these studies, they examined five types of state and district policies regarding school choice to identify how these policies can be structured to improve the education received by disadvantaged students. These five “policy levers”, identified through theory and past empirical work, are:

  • Planning and oversight: including charter school application and authorization processes, school openings and closures, and school regulation and accountability
  • Transportation: including access to and form of transportation to school, distance and commuting times
  • Enrollment systems: including centralized enrollment systems, the use of priority categories in lotteries, inter-district choice regulation
  • Information: including low- and high-cost approaches to informing families about school choice opportunities and the application process
  • Teacher: including teacher supply, distribution, turnover by type of school and the role of collective bargaining

In addition, the REACH Center examined a related set of issues including the extensiveness of school choice in a district, student sorting, virtual charters, and students with disabilities.

The quantitative studies under each policy lever and the related issues ranged from descriptive to experimental. They were complemented by qualitative studies to further examine issues and gaps in understanding for each lever. The studies were carried out at the national, state, and district levels. At the state level, the research focused on Florida, Louisiana, Michigan, and Oregon. Additional research at the district level focused on Baltimore, New Orleans, Denver, and New York City.

Concurrently, the REACH Center developed the NLSD, a 30-year near-census dataset of all traditional public, charter, and private schools in the U.S including available measures of school outcomes (e.g., achievement, graduation rates), school type (e.g., magnet, virtual), and relevant state policies.

The REACH funding came with some initially uncommitted funds whose use were determined after the grant was given. As the COVID crisis emerged two years after the grant started, the center’s leadership and IES leadership agreed to use these resources for 10 studies to help understand how schools responded to the COVID crisis, how the virus was spreading in schools, and how the crisis changed the schooling market.

National leadership and outreach activities

The REACH Center provided leadership and outreach to practitioners, policymakers, and researchers on the issue of school choice. Through its National Policy Advisory Board, composed of education associations representing both traditional and choice schools as well as other stakeholders, the REACH Center shared and received feedback from the field on its research agenda, interpretation of findings, and dissemination strategies. The REACH Center hosted a series of conferences and used a variety of forums to share its findings and interact with policymakers, practitioners, and researchers (e.g., policy briefs, videos, blogs, op-eds, social media, and e-newsletters). They also created and released a public-use version of the NLSD.

People and institutions involved

Project contributors

Joshua Cowen

Co-principal investigator

Jane Lincove

Co-principal investigator

Julie Marsh

Co-principal investigator

Andrew McEachin

Co-principal investigator

Amy Ellen Schwartz

Co-principal investigator

Marc Stein

Co-principal investigator

Katharine Strunk

Co-principal investigator
Michigan State University

Jon Valant

Co-principal investigator

Katrina Bulkley

Co-principal investigator

Products and publications

Project website:

REACH

Publications:

Chen, F., & Harris, D. N. (2023). The market-level effects of charter schools on student outcomes: A national analysis of school districts. Journal of Public Economics, 228, 105015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2023.105015

Chen, F., Harris, D. N., & Penn, M. (2024). The effects of charter school entry on the supply of teachers from university-based education programs. Economics of Education Review, 99, 102520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2024.102520

Harris, D., & McKenzie, R. (2023). The Regulation of Charter Schools: National Patterns and Causal Effects. Technical Report. National Center for Research on Education Access and Choice. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED633846 

Harris, D. N., & Martinez-Pabon, V. (2023). Extreme Measures: A National Descriptive Analysis of Closure and Restructuring of Traditional Public, Charter, and Private Schools. Education Finance and Policy, 19(1), 32–60. https://doi.org/10.1162/edfp_a_00386

See ERIC for a full list of publications from the grant. 

Available data:

https://reachcentered.org/data-nlsd

Questions about this project?

To answer additional questions about this project or provide feedback, please contact the program officer.

 

Tags

EducatorsK-12 EducationPolicies and Standards

Share

Icon to link to Facebook social media siteIcon to link to X social media siteIcon to link to LinkedIn social media siteIcon to copy link value

Questions about this project?

To answer additional questions about this project or provide feedback, please contact the program officer.

 

You may also like

Blue zoomed in IES logo
Workshop/Training

Strengthening Math Instruction Through Computation...

October 14, 2026
Read More
Zoomed in IES logo
Other Resource

Micro-Credentials for Professional Learning and Al...

Author(s): Cerelle Morrow
Read More
Zoomed in IES logo
Other Resource

Middle School Mathematics Course Context Survey

Author(s): The Regional Educational Laboratory (REL) Program
Read More
icon-dot-govicon-https icon-quote