Project Activities
Changes were made to the life science, physical science, and earth science units of two widely-used curricula: Holt and FOSS. There was a high intersection of content between the two curricula and state standardized science assessments. The Cognitive Science Teams (CSTs) designed and conducted small-scale pilot studies, followed by selection and refinement of the adaptations. Next, the CSTs worked with the Professional Development Teams (PDTs) to produce professional development materials to support teaching the specified curriculum through the use of the adaptations. An efficacy study was conducted to evaluate the impact of these adaptations on student learning after they underwent the full cycle of small-scale piloting and one year of large scale testing, analysis and modification. Middle-schools in Delaware, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania were randomly assigned to one of three experimental treatment groups: (1) full treatment, with curriculum adaptations and professional development on both the adaptations and curriculum content; (2) limited treatment, with standard Holt or FOSS curriculum and professional development on the curriculum content; and (3) control condition, with standard Holt or FOSS curriculum with no additional professional development. Outcome measures included grade 8 state standardized science assessments and researcher-developed science assessments. Three-level hierarchical linear models (with students nested within classrooms nested within schools) were used to examine the effect of the science curriculum adaptations on student achievement.
People and institutions involved
IES program contact(s)
Project contributors
Products and publications
ERIC Citations: Find available citations in ERIC for this award here.
Journal article, monograph, or newsletter
Alfieri, L., Nokes-Malach, T.J., and Schunn, C.D. (2013). Learning Through Case Comparisons: A Meta-Analytic Review. Educational Psychologist, 48(2): 87-113.
Covay Minor, E., Desimone, L.M., Caines Lee, J., and Hochberg, E. (2016). Insights on how to Shape Teacher Learning Policy: The Role of Teacher Content Knowledge in Explaining Differential Effects of Professional Development. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 24(61): 1-34.
Cromley, J.G., Weisberg, S.M., Dai, T., Newcombe, N.S., Schunn, C.D., Massey, C., and Merlino, F.J. (2016). Improving Middle School Science Learning Using Diagrammatic Reasoning. Science Education, 100(6): 1184-1213.
Porter, A.C., Polikoff, M.S., Barghaus, K.M., and Yang, R. (2013). Constructing Aligned Assessments: Using Automated Test Construction. Educational Researcher, 42(8): 415-423.
Proceeding
Resnick, I., Shipley, T.F., Newcombe, N., Massey, C., and Wills, T. (2012). Examining the Representation and Understanding of Large Magnitudes Using the Hierarchical Alignment Model of Analogical Reasoning. In Proceedings of the 34th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 917-922). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
Project website:
Supplemental information
Topic: Cognition and Science Instruction
Questions about this project?
To answer additional questions about this project or provide feedback, please contact the program officer.