Project Activities
The research team planned to develop approximately 130 lessons arranged into four bands that span content typically taught in kindergarten and 1st grade, with bands increasing in difficulty. The lesson units were to be developed and revised based on results from exploratory field testing and feedback from teachers, parents, and expert consultants. Two pilot studies were planned to assess the feasibility and promise of the intervention for improving literacy outcomes using single-case design, with the first study examining more proximal outcomes and the second study examining more distal outcomes.
Structured Abstract
Setting
The research will take place in schools in Texas.
Sample
Over 4 years, approximately 75 students in grades 1 to 4 will participate in the project. The students will be verbal and have IQ scores that range from 40 to 79.
Approximately 130 lessons will be developed and arranged into four bands that span content typically taught in kindergarten and 1st grade. The bands will increase in difficulty and include phonological awareness, phonics, vocabulary, fluency, and comprehension instruction. Students will receive the intervention lessons two to three times per week after skills have been introduced in the core reading program. There are four main components in the intervention. The first component consists of carefully designed fiction and nonfiction books that include the repetitive practice of high-frequency regular and irregular words. The second component will include brief teacher-led lessons that can be linked easily to core reading instruction and integrated into the structure of students' existing routines. The third component includes practice materials that accompany each book and require minimal supervision and assistance from paraprofessionals. The final component includes professional development materials, assessments proximal to the intervention, and planning tools to support implementation.
Research design and methods
During the first 2 years of the project, lesson units will be developed and revised based on results from exploratory field testing and feedback from teachers, parents, and expert consultants. Two pilot studies will be conducted in years 2–4 to assess the feasibility and promise of the intervention for improving outcomes. The first study will span one academic semester and use a single-case, multiple baseline design to analyze progress on weekly measures that are proximal to the intervention. The second study, which will span five academic semesters, will use a single-case, multiple baseline design to analyze progress on distal measures that are administered monthly.
Control condition
Due to the nature of the single-case design studies, students will serve as their own controls. They will receive instruction typically provided by the schools.
Key measures
The promise of the intervention will be evaluated on a continuum of outcome measures that are proximal and distal to the intervention. Proximal progress monitoring measures include researcher-developed child assessments (based on the instructional materials) of phoneme segmentation fluency, nonsense word fluency, and oral reading fluency, each based on the corresponding subtest of the Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (DIBELS). Distal progress monitoring will include DIBELS Phoneme Segmentation Fluency, Nonsense Word Fluency, and First Grade Oral Reading Fluency. Distal outcome measures will include Comprehensive Test of Phonological Processing Blending Words, Blending Nonwords, and Segmenting Words; Expressive Vocabulary Test; Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-IV; Test of Word Reading Efficiency; and Woodcock Johnson III Letter Word Identification, Word Attack, and Passage Comprehension. Fidelity of implementation data will also be collected for the intervention as well as the core reading program through teacher observations and self-report. Finally, surveys will be administered to teachers, other instructional personnel, students, and parents to determine satisfaction and feasibility of intervention implementation.
Data analytic strategy
Visual analysis will be used to document a functional relation between the intervention and reading outcomes. In addition, hierarchical linear modeling will be used to estimate the progress of each student using proximal and distal reading measures.
People and institutions involved
IES program contact(s)
Project contributors
Products and publications
ERIC Citations: Find available citations in ERIC for this award here.
Select publications:
Jones, G. F., Gifford, D.B., Yovanoff, P., Al Otaiba, S. Levy, D., and Allor, J. (2019). Alternate assessment formats for progress monitoring students with intellectual disabilities and below average IQ: An exploratory study. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 34(1), 41-51.
Lemons, C. J., Allor, J., Al Otaiba, S., and LeJeune, L. M. (2016). 10 research-based tips for enhancing literacy instruction for students with intellectual disability. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 49(1), 18-30. doi:10.1177/0040059916662202
Related projects
Questions about this project?
To answer additional questions about this project or provide feedback, please contact the program officer.
