Skip to main content

Breadcrumb

Home arrow_forward_ios Information on IES-Funded Research arrow_forward_ios State-specific Design Parameters fo ...
Home arrow_forward_ios ... arrow_forward_ios State-specific Design Parameters fo ...
Information on IES-Funded Research
Grant Closed

State-specific Design Parameters for Designing Better Evaluation Studies

NCER
Program: Statistical and Research Methodology in Education
Program topic(s): Core
Award amount: $1,128,562
Principal investigator: Larry Hedges
Awardee:
NORC at the University of Chicago
Year: 2011
Award period: 3 years (01/01/2011 - 01/01/2014)
Project type:
Methodological Innovation
Award number: R305D110032

Purpose

This project used five state data systems to compute design parameters (including intraclass correlations and variance accounted for by pretest data) at the state, district, school, and classroom levels. Additionally, meaningful subsets of the states defined geographically, in terms of achievement levels (e.g., low achieving schools or districts), and in terms of socioeconomic status (e.g., low SES schools or districts) were also collected.

Project Activities

Many educational experiments use designs that involve the random assignment of entire pre-existing groups (e.g., classrooms, schools, districts) to treatments. The groups typically used in education experiments are not themselves composed at random. As a result, individuals in the same group tend to be more alike than individuals in different groups implying a kind of dependence among individuals in groups called intraclass correlation (ICC). As these experiments include multiple levels of clustering (e.g., students in classrooms, classrooms in schools, schools in districts), they have multiple ICCs (one for each cluster). The statistical power, precision of estimates for treatment effects, efficient allocation of sample between levels, and the minimum detectable effect size all depend on the intraclass correlation structure and (if covariates are used) the effectiveness of the covariates at explaining variation at each of the levels that they are used. ICCs obtained from single district data may be too imprecise or too poorly matched to a current experiment to provide adequate guidance and those obtained from national surveys may be too general to be optimally useful. Using mixed linear models, the project decomposed the total variation of state achievement test scores (in reading and math) into district, school, classroom, and student level variance components. These variance components were then used to estimate ICCs at the district, school, and classroom levels.

People and institutions involved

IES program contact(s)

Allen Ruby

Associate Commissioner for Policy and Systems
NCER

Products and publications

Journal article, monograph, or newsletter

Hedberg, E.C., and Hedges, L.V. (2014). Reference Values of Within-District Intraclass Correlations of Academic Achievement by District Characteristics: Results From a Meta-Analysis of District-Specific Values. Evaluation Review, 38(6), 546-582.

Hedges, L.V., and Hedberg, E.C. (2013). Intraclass Correlations and Covariate Outcome Correlations for Planning Two- and Three-Level Cluster-Randomized Experiments in Education. Evaluation Review, 37(6), 445-489.

Hedges, L.V., Hedberg, E.C., and Kuyper, A.M. (2012). The Variance of Intraclass Correlations in Three- and Four-Level Models. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 72(6): 893-909.

Supplemental information

Co-Principal Investigator: Hedberg, Eric

The project estimated design parameters for students in particular grades in each state subdivided by three dimensions. The first dimension is an outcome metric that will include achievement status (achievement at a single point in time) and growth (the difference between achievement in a particular year and those in a previous year) in reading and in mathematics in a particular grade. The second dimension involves analyses involving covariates and will focus on four models: (1) no covariates; (2) demographic covariates; (3) pre-test covariates; and (4) combinations of demographic and pretest covariates. The third dimension involves how design parameters differ across different school contexts with a focus on low-performing schools, schools serving low-income populations, or schools with large minority populations. A secondary objective of the project was to use the longitudinal state data to estimate single year increases in achievement in effect-size units for particular grades and subjects. This included estimating effect sizes for participating states controlling for each of the covariate sets and for the different school contexts.

Questions about this project?

To answer additional questions about this project or provide feedback, please contact the program officer.

 

Tags

Mathematics

Share

Icon to link to Facebook social media siteIcon to link to X social media siteIcon to link to LinkedIn social media siteIcon to copy link value

Questions about this project?

To answer additional questions about this project or provide feedback, please contact the program officer.

 

You may also like

Blue 3 Placeholder Pattern 1
Statistical Analysis Report

2024 NAEP Mathematics Assessment: Results at Grade...

Author(s): National Center for Education Statistics (NCES)
Publication number: NCES 2024217
Read More
Zoomed in IES logo
Statistics in Brief

NAEP Mathematics 2024 State and District Snapshot ...

Author(s): National Center for Education Statistics (NCES)
Publication number: NCES 2024219
Read More
Zoomed in IES logo
First Look / ED TAB

TIMSS 2023 U.S. Highlights Web Report

Author(s): Catharine Warner-Griffin, Grace Handley, Benjamin Dalton, Debbie Herget
Publication number: NCES 2024184
Read More
icon-dot-govicon-https icon-quote