Skip to main content

Breadcrumb

Home arrow_forward_ios Information on IES-Funded Research arrow_forward_ios Strategic School Funding for Result ...
Home arrow_forward_ios ... arrow_forward_ios Strategic School Funding for Result ...
Information on IES-Funded Research
Grant Closed

Strategic School Funding for Results Project, Phase II

NCER
Program: Education Research Grants
Program topic(s): Improving Education Systems
Award amount: $1,660,930
Principal investigator: Jay Chambers
Awardee:
American Institutes for Research (AIR)
Year: 2010
Award period: 1 year (08/01/2012 - 07/31/2013)
Project type:
Development and Innovation
Award number: R305A100630

Purpose

Urban school districts' standard resource allocation practices are often based on top-down decision making that leaves schools with little or no discretion about how their resources are used. Moreover, the distribution of resources across schools within these districts relies substantially on standardized staffing formulas based on total school enrollment or allocation mechanisms prescribed by categorical funding programs (e.g., Title I). In many districts, principals have little or no authority over how many or which specific teachers or other school personnel they employ, how much they allocate to professional development activities, the nature of the curriculum they offer, or the schedule they employ for connecting staff with students.

This project endeavors to provide an infrastructure with an integrated collection of policies, procedures and tools—including (computerized) enhanced data management information— for decentralized needs-based resource management. Researchers will work with district partners to assess what works and what does not to iteratively build a structure and procedures that can be both formal and flexible, and can eventually be tested rigorously. The project expands on an existing project, the Strategic School Funding for Results (SSFR), which was carried out by the American Institutes for Research and Pivot Learning Partners working in partnership with three large, urban California school districts with funding by the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation and the Ford Foundation. The outcome of the project will be a fully developed SSFR intervention, together with the identification of factors that affect its implementation.

Project Activities

Development of the SSFR will include: (a) developing and supporting a student-need-based funding formula; (b) establishing a viable accountability structure; (c) creating workable incentive structures for reallocating teachers that are acceptable to the wide range of stakeholders (e.g., board members and employee associations); (d) identifying ways of achieving maximum flexibility from existing state and federal funding programs; and (e) introducing the competitive pressures associated with family and student choice. The AIR/PLP team will combine surveys, interviews, and critical incident techniques as well as quantitative methods to explore changes in the patterns of resource allocation, student outcomes, attitudes, and perspectives of key constituencies associated with implementation of the SSFR model.

Structured Abstract

Setting

The study will take place in three school districts, the Los Angeles Unified School District, Twin Rivers, and the Pasadena Unified School District. A sample of pilot schools in each district, totaling 20 schools, will also be studied.

Sample

This study will analyze data on the leadership teams from the school districts and the pilot schools. The schools serve large numbers of students that have been identified as needing extra services, such as English language learners, students with disabilities, and academically at risk students.

Intervention

There are six core reform strategies that are part of the intervention: (1) need-based funding of schools; (2) school autonomy and accountability; (3) school choice; (4) incentives for improving the distribution of effective teachers; (5) service-economy model for purchasing services; and (6) participatory decision making.

Research design and methods

Development will take place through an iterative data collection process. The feedback process for the iterative development process involves: (1) the algorithm for weighting categories of student needs, (2) the adequacy of budgetary and requirements information to users at district levels and school levels, and (3) the user-friendliness of systems and visual displays. The pilot study will include interview data and student outcome data collected from both treatment and control schools and other indicators of feasibility and improvement from just the treatment schools.

Control condition

The control condition will be “business as usual” for the comparison schools.

Key measures

While the focus of data collection efforts will be on evaluating intervention components, changes over time will be examined with the following measures: patterns of resource allocation, school-level language arts and math scale scores on the California Standardized Tests, and perspectives of key stakeholders and constituents.

Data analytic strategy

Descriptive and correlational analyses conducted throughout the study will be augmented by comparative interrupted time-series analyses in the final year.

People and institutions involved

IES program contact(s)

Corinne Alfeld

Education Research Analyst
NCER

Project contributors

Jim Brown

Co-principal investigator

Products and publications

Products: Interim products include a resource allocation formula, computerized district and school level data management systems, and fidelity of implementation measures. The final product will be a fully developed and pilot-tested needs-based funding model with policies and tools for addressing decision making and accountability regarding how funds are used. Peer reviewed publications describing the SSFR model and the findings regarding its implementation will also be produced.

Nongovernment report, issue brief, or practice guide

Haxton, C.L., Chambers, J. G., Manship, K., Cruz, L., and O'Neil, C. (2012). Perspectives of Central Office Staff, Principals, Teachers, and School Site Councils on Resource Allocation and SSFR Implementation In 2010-11 (Twin Rivers Unified School District). Washington, DC: American Institute for Research.

** This project was submitted to and funded under Education Policy, Finance, and Systems in FY 2010.

Supplemental information

 

Note: This project's research and design has changed to include working primarily with the Los Angeles Unified School District.

Questions about this project?

To answer additional questions about this project or provide feedback, please contact the program officer.

 

Tags

Policies and Standards

Share

Icon to link to Facebook social media siteIcon to link to X social media siteIcon to link to LinkedIn social media siteIcon to copy link value

Questions about this project?

To answer additional questions about this project or provide feedback, please contact the program officer.

 

You may also like

Zoomed in IES logo
Contract

What Works Clearinghouse Supporting and Analyzing ...

Contract number: 91990025F0014
Read More
Zoomed in IES logo
Training Material

Reduced calendar years: How are they implemented, ...

Read More
Zoomed in IES logo
Fact Sheet/Infographic/FAQ

Consistent Implementation of a Multi-Tiered System...

Read More
icon-dot-govicon-https icon-quote