Skip to main content

Breadcrumb

Home arrow_forward_ios Information on IES-Funded Research arrow_forward_ios Understanding Adaptive Problem-Solv ...
Home arrow_forward_ios ... arrow_forward_ios Understanding Adaptive Problem-Solv ...
Information on IES-Funded Research
Grant Open

Understanding Adaptive Problem-Solving Skills in a Digital Context for Low-Skilled Adults in the United States

NCER
Program: Education Research Grants
Program topic(s): Postsecondary and Adult Education
Award amount: $1,699,999
Principal investigator: Elizabeth Tighe
Awardee:
Georgia State University
Year: 2024
Award period: 3 years 11 months (09/01/2024 - 08/31/2028)
Project type:
Exploration
Award number: R305A240292

Purpose

In this project, the researchers will explore the prevalence and nature of the challenges adults with low foundational skills (reading, numeracy) may face when engaging with digital assessments relative to adults with higher foundational skills. Adults with low foundational skills account for a sizable and non-ignorable proportion of the U.S. population, and the percent of adults who also have low digital skills is also significant. According to a 2019 NCES report, roughly 64 percent of U.S. adults perform at or below basic digital problem-solving skill levels, with 23 percent falling at the most elementary levels. When adults struggle with a digital assessment or digital problem solving, it is unclear what might be leading to the low performance. Because such assessments are high stakes and used for decisions, such as enrollment in educational programs (e.g., adult literacy, developmental education), progress monitoring, funding decisions, or determining educational levels, it is important to determine how performance on these assessments may reflect a host of challenges. These challenges could reflect a test taker's poor or inability to access or use technology, impoverished foundational literacy skills, problem-solving skill gaps, or some combination of these. The researchers aim to provide insights into the prevalence and nature of the challenges faced by adults with low skills to help identify ways to leverage or better develop digital assessments and to inform instructional endeavors to help adults overcome challenges.

Project Activities

The researchers will conduct a series of studies that include using extant process data from the Program for the International Assessment of Adult Competencies (PIAAC) and primary data. Using the PIAAC data, the team will examine how adults with different skill levels behaviorally interact (such as patterns of engagement, efficiency, test-taking strategies) with different types of adaptive problem-solving items. Using both PIAAC and think-aloud data, they will examine cognitive and metacognitive strategies that correspond to the observed process data behaviors as adults with different levels of skill engage with PIAAC adaptive problem-solving items. The researchers will also explore the extent to which the process and think-aloud data are related to adults' foundational literacy skills and background characteristics (e.g., demographics), and they will use a survey and focus groups to understand technology access and use in adult literacy classrooms.

Structured Abstract

Setting

The research team will use a nationally representative U.S. sample of adults from the extant 2022 Cycle 2 PIAAC process data. They will also collect data from adults in Georgia.

Sample

The U.S. 2022 PIAAC process data (released approximately in January 2025) include a nationally representative sample of adults aged 16 to 65 (across three cognitive domains - literacy, numeracy, adaptive problem-solving [APS]). The research team will use the APS domain process files to examine adults with low skills (Level 1 and below) and higher skills (Levels 2 and 3). They will collect data from learners in adult literacy programs (N = 120) who read between 6th and 10th grade levels, college students (120), and adult literacy teachers (N = 7).

Factors

The researchers will explore how low-skilled adults engage with adaptive problem-solving items relative to higher-skilled adults. Some of the factors that may affect performance include background characteristics of the learners, such as information and communications technology (ICT) skills (basic computer skills, using web features, clicking functions, mouse dragging, etc.) and foundational reading skills. Another set of relevant factors include features of the assessment modality and item characteristics. The researchers will also consider factors relevant to the frameworks that informed the development of PIAAC items: the PIAAC APS framework and the RESOLV model. The PIAAC framework assumes that the contexts and nature of the task are important aspects of adaptive problem solving, and the PIAAC items reflect this. The RESOLV model also assumes that general problem solving requires cognitive and metacognitive processes (e.g., goal setting, progress monitoring, organizing), which are important to all problem-solving tasks involving texts, and that these processes will vary based on the nature of the task.

Research design and methods

This project includes multiple studies: one set that focuses primarily on the process data and another set that focuses more fully on the process data. In the first study using the PIAAC adaptive problem-solving (APS) process data, the researchers will examine whether task-specific APS dimensions (information environment, problem context, digital tools) create challenges for adults with lower skills compared to those with higher skills. In the APS study 2, they will explore test-takers' distinct behavior patterns (engagement, efficiency, response patterns, strategies) on APS items of successful as compared to unsuccessful respondents. In the APS study 3, they will assess whether distinct behavior patterns (from study 2) relate to literacy performance and respondent characteristics (demographics, information and communications technology [ICT] skill use, problem-solving skills use). In the first think-aloud (TA) study, the researchers will pilot a think-aloud protocol to identify specific cognitive, metacognitive, and problem-solving strategies used by adults with differing levels of skill on linear texts and how these relate to comprehension performance. In TA study 2, they will develop a think-aloud protocol specific to adaptive problem-solving and pilot this with adults of varying skill levels. In TA study 3, they will conduct a virtual survey and focus group with adult literacy instructors on access and use of technology. In TA study 4, they will refine their think-aloud protocol and collect think-aloud and process data from adults with differing skill levels and explore whether think-aloud strategies, process data behaviors, individual differences measures, and background characteristics are predictive of item accuracy for adults with lower or higher skills.

Control condition

Due to nature of this study, there is no control condition. However, the researchers will compare adults based on their skill levels (higher and lower).

Key measures

The primary measure from the PIAAC are process data from the APS domain, which assesses adults' adaptive problem-solving skills in a digital context as a single score (0–500 scale score) and includes interactive and dynamic items that cross contexts. PIAAC typically breaks the scale into three proficiency levels: Level 1, Level 2, and Level 3. The researchers will also include total scores on the literacy and APS domains and respondent background characteristics from the main 2022 U.S. PIAAC dataset. They will develop and collect data from think-aloud protocols and will also collect a comprehensive demographic survey and a battery of reading component skills from their primary-data sample.

Data analytic strategy

Depending on the particular study, the researchers will use one or more analytic strategy. The possible strategies include descriptive analyses, cognitive diagnostic modeling, sequence mining techniques, latent state comparison analyses, supervised machine learning methods, LASSO, regression, cluster analyses, and multi-level modeling.

People and institutions involved

IES program contact(s)

Meredith Larson

Education Research Analyst
NCER

Project contributors

Joseph Magliano

Co-principal investigator

Products and publications

The researchers will refine theoretical models on the challenges faced by adults with low foundational skills in the context of adaptive problem-solving skills, and they will conduct workshops for researchers interested in analyzing process data from large-scale digital and will produce peer-reviewed publications and other materials for both research and non-research audiences.

Publications:

ERIC Citations: Find available citations in ERIC for this award here.

Related projects

Using Process Data to Characterize Response Profiles and Test-Taking Behaviors of Low-Skilled Adult Responders on PIAAC Literacy and Numeracy Items

R305A210344

Supplemental information

Co-Principal Investigators: He, Qiwei; Magliano, Joseph

Questions about this project?

To answer additional questions about this project or provide feedback, please contact the program officer.

 

Tags

Adult Basic SkillsAdult EducationEducation Technology

Share

Icon to link to Facebook social media siteIcon to link to X social media siteIcon to link to LinkedIn social media siteIcon to copy link value

Questions about this project?

To answer additional questions about this project or provide feedback, please contact the program officer.

 

You may also like

Zoomed in IES logo
Workshop/Training

Data Science Methods for Digital Learning Platform...

August 18, 2025
Read More
Zoomed in IES logo
Workshop/Training

Data Science for Education (DS4EDU)

April 01, 2025
Read More
Zoomed in IES logo
Request for Applications

Education Research and Development Center Program ...

March 14, 2025
Read More
icon-dot-govicon-https icon-quote