Skip to main content

Breadcrumb

Home arrow_forward_ios Information on IES-Funded Research arrow_forward_ios Validating the Use of Growth Measur ...
Home arrow_forward_ios ... arrow_forward_ios Validating the Use of Growth Measur ...
Information on IES-Funded Research
Grant Closed

Validating the Use of Growth Measures from Statewide Standards-Based Summative Assessments for Students with Disabilities

NCSER
Program: Special Education Research Grants
Program topic(s): Systems, Policy, and Finance
Award amount: $300,089
Principal investigator: Heather Buzick
Awardee:
Educational Testing Service (ETS)
Year: 2012
Award period: 1 year 11 months (07/01/2012 - 06/30/2014)
Project type:
Measurement
Award number: R324A120224

Purpose

There has been a national push to use growth modeling with scores from statewide standards-based summative assessments to evaluate schools, teachers, and student subgroups. Yet for students with disabilities, there has been little research exploring the use of growth modeling for this subpopulation to determine if interpretations about schools, teachers, and the academic progress of the subgroup are valid. The purpose of this study is to provide validity evidence for the use of test scores from students with disabilities on statewide standards-based summative assessments for the purposes of growth modeling and other growth-based models for accountability.

Project Activities

The grantee will obtain five states' datasets with students' results on the statewide standards-based assessment for 3 years. The number of students with disabilities in each grade between grades 3 and 8 will range from approximately 1,500 to 18,000 across states. The grantee will compare the results of different growth-based models for accountability by grade, content, and number of years of test results, and will explore the role of testing accommodations in measuring growth.

Structured Abstract

Setting

The datasets to be examined are from California, Colorado, Indiana, Massachusetts, and Virginia.

Sample

Approximately 1,500 to 18,000 students with disabilities per grade in grades 3-8 will be included in the study, each with data across 3 years. The sample includes students with disabilities who took the standards-based summative assessments with or without accommodations. Students without disabilities will be included for comparison.

Assessment

The assessments are the statewide standards-based assessments in English language arts and mathematics for grades 3–8.

Research design and methods

The project is examining five states' extant datasets to validate inferences from growth modeling results. Databases combining 2 years or 3 years of scores for each student will be compared to evaluate whether different numbers of test scores impacts growth modeling results. In addition, the datasets will allow for comparisons across grades and content areas. There will be a total of 8 3-year datasets and 10 2-year datasets. English language learners with disabilities will be tagged in the datasets so that the analyses can include and exclude them to establish how this subpopulation compares with the overall results of students with disabilities. Descriptive analyses will document systematic factors that may impact growth modeling, including inconsistent accommodation use and subgroup performance and growth.

Control condition

The study will include students without disabilities in the statewide datasets for comparison.

Key measures

Due to the nature of this research, the only key measures are the statewide standards-based assessments in English language arts and mathematics for grades 3–8, which also include information on English language learner status, disability category, and accommodation use.

Data analytic strategy

The four-part data analysis consists of the following: (1) descriptive statistics on the characteristics of longitudinal data for students with disabilities; (2) documentation of the growth of students with disabilities as measured by statewide summative assessments; (3) a comparison of growth models on predictive accuracy (2 vs. 3 years of data), classification accuracy, and the percentage of students identified as on track to proficiency; and (4) descriptive statistics, model development, and model comparisons to explore the role of testing accommodations in growth models.

People and institutions involved

IES program contact(s)

Katherine Taylor

Education Research Analyst
NCSER

Products and publications

Products: The products of this project will include recommendations on growth modeling and longitudinal data collection for students with disabilities taking statewide summative assessments, peer-reviewed publications, and presentations.

Journal article, monograph, or newsletter

Buzick, H.M., and Jones, N.D. (2015). Using Test Scores From Students With Disabilities in Teacher Evaluation. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 34(3): 28-38. doi:10.1111/emip.12076

Jones, N.D., Buzick, H.M., and Turkan, S. (2013). Including Students With Disabilities and English Learners in Measures of Educator Effectiveness. Educational Researcher, 42(4): 234-241. doi:10.3102/0013189X12468211?

Questions about this project?

To answer additional questions about this project or provide feedback, please contact the program officer.

 

Tags

LanguageMathematicsPolicies and Standards

Share

Icon to link to Facebook social media siteIcon to link to X social media siteIcon to link to LinkedIn social media siteIcon to copy link value

Questions about this project?

To answer additional questions about this project or provide feedback, please contact the program officer.

 

You may also like

Blue 3 Placeholder Pattern 1
Statistical Analysis Report

2024 NAEP Mathematics Assessment: Results at Grade...

Author(s): National Center for Education Statistics (NCES)
Publication number: NCES 2024217
Read More
Zoomed in IES logo
Statistics in Brief

NAEP Mathematics 2024 State and District Snapshot ...

Author(s): National Center for Education Statistics (NCES)
Publication number: NCES 2024219
Read More
Zoomed in IES logo
Contract

What Works Clearinghouse Supporting and Analyzing ...

Contract number: 91990025F0014
Read More
icon-dot-govicon-https icon-quote