Skip to main content

Breadcrumb

Home arrow_forward_ios Information on ... arrow_forward_ios Value-Added Mod ...
Home arrow_forward_ios ... arrow_forward_ios Value-Added Mod ...
Information on ...
Grant Closed

Value-Added Models and Accountability: Next Steps

NCER
Program: Statistical and Research Methodology in Education
Program topic(s): Core
Award amount: $1,200,000
Principal investigator: Robert Meyer
Awardee:
University of Wisconsin, Madison
Year: 2010
Award period: 4 months (03/01/2013 - 07/02/2013)
Project type:
Methodological Innovation
Award number: R305D100018

Purpose

Value-added models and indicators are being considered for use and are being used to measure the performance of schools, teachers, programs, and policies on an ongoing basis. Most current value-added models fall into two somewhat distinct groups, those that treat individual effects as random and those that treat individual effects as fixed. Random-effects models have been found to yield relatively precise estimates of school and classroom effects but can suffer from an inability to control for student selectivity (e.g., schools or classrooms serve different student populations) that produces estimates subject to selection bias. Fixed effects models control for time-invariant selectivity but typically yield relatively less precise school and classroom effects estimates.

This project sought to develop and refine a new value-added model that combines the best features of models with random and fixed individual effects—that is, high precision and low selection bias. Known as the generalized value-added model with conditional random effects and multivariate shrinkage (CRE-MS) this model is to yield reductions in expected mean squared error relative to other value-added models and provide estimates of precision that take into account the error due to uncontrolled selection bias as well as traditional estimation error. The development of the CRE-MS model builds off of two research strands. First is the literature on testing the assumptions of the fixed effects model and imposing them in a more flexible manner that can lead to the development of conditional random effects (CRE) model which captures the nonrandom selection/assignment of students to schools and classrooms. Second is the work on shrinkage estimation that can be applied to the CRE model and used to optimally balance precision and selection bias. Different approaches for computing multivariate shrinkage estimates will be investigated for the CRE-MS model, in part to address the computational burden involved and the potential need to use information across multiple student cohorts.

In addition to developing CRE-MS model, the project extended it to accommodate: (a) midyear testing; (b) multidimensionality in measured achievement, possible violations of the equal interval property, and irregularities in horizontal and vertical equating; and (c) multiple assessment systems in the same district, including short-cycle assessments.

Project Activities

Application to both simulated and real world data was used to confirm the statistical properties of the models and estimation techniques used in the analysis and to investigate the robustness of the various models. Testing the CRE-MS model through Monte Carlo simulation focused on comparing the bias and precision of model estimates under different conditions relative to estimates from the random and fixed effects models. The following conditions were varied: (a) variance of initial selection bias and growth selection bias, (b) rates and patterns of cross-school and cross-classroom mobility at transitional and non-transitional grades, (c) the number of schools in a district (or state), the number of classrooms per school, and the number of students per classroom and (d) the sensitivity of estimates to violations of the maintained assumptions.

Four urban school districts worked with the project and their data was used to test the viability of the CRE-MS models when using real data and determine 1) if the models provide clear and useful information to the schools and districts, 2) if the information is more accurate and useful than what is now provided using existing value-added models.

People and institutions involved

IES program contact(s)

Allen Ruby

Products and publications

Book chapter

Meyer, R., and Dokumaci, E. (2014). Value-Added Models and the Next Generation of Assessments. In R.W. Lissitz (Ed.), Value Added Modeling and Growth Modeling with Particular Application to Teacher and School Effectiveness. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.

Journal article, monograph, or newsletter

Bolt, D. M., Deng, S., & Lee, S. (2014). IRT model misspecification and measurement of growth in vertical scaling. Journal of Educational Measurement, 51(2), 141-162.

Questions about this project?

To answer additional questions about this project or provide feedback, please contact the program officer.

 

Tags

Data and AssessmentsMathematicsPolicies and Standards

Share

Icon to link to Facebook social media siteIcon to link to X social media siteIcon to link to LinkedIn social media siteIcon to copy link value

Questions about this project?

To answer additional questions about this project or provide feedback, please contact the program officer.

 

You may also like

Zoomed in IES logo
Workshop/Training

Summer Research Training Institute on Cluster-Rand...

July 06, 2026
Read More
Zoomed in IES logo
Workshop/Training

Data Science for Education (DS4EDU)

July 01, 2026
Read More
Zoomed in IES logo
Workshop/Training

Instructional Strategies to Help Middle and High S...

May 14, 2026
Read More
icon-dot-govicon-https icon-quote