Skip to main content

Breadcrumb

Home arrow_forward_ios Evaluations arrow_forward_ios Study of the Impact of English Lear ...
Home arrow_forward_ios ... arrow_forward_ios Study of the Impact of English Lear ...
Evaluations
Contract Canceled

Study of the Impact of English Learner Classification and Reclassification Policies

NCEE Evaluation Division K-12 Studies
Program: Elementary and Secondary Education Act
Evaluation topic(s): English Learners
Award amount: $9,791,111
Awardee:
Westat, WestEd, The WIDA Consortium, Joseph Cimpian, Civilytics Consulting
Year: 2021
Duration: 3 years 5 months (09/01/2021 - 02/10/2025)
Project type:
Effectiveness, Impact
Contract number: 91990021D0004/91990021F0387, 91990021D0004/91990022F0057

Background

Entry into and exit from English learner (EL) status are high-stakes decisions with implications for student achievement in the U.S. EL status governs the instructional settings and language supports available to students. Since former ELs are no longer entitled to language supports, exiting EL status too soon can leave these students unprepared for success in general education settings. However, maintaining EL status for too long can compromise students' opportunities to learn academic content among their peers. The decision is complicated by lack of universal agreement on a definition for English proficiency and wide variation in entrance and exit criteria. To reduce variability in EL entry and exit procedures within states, the 2015 reauthorization of Title III of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (the Every Student Succeeds Act, or ESSA) required states to develop standardized procedures. The shift to statewide standardization in procedures provided a unique opportunity to study the impact of classification and reclassification nationwide. This study would have assessed how impacts for students varied across contexts, such as the level of proficiency states required to exit, whether states considered factors other than ELP assessment scores, instructional policies, policies for monitoring and serving former ELs, and characteristics of the EL population enrolled.

Project Activities

Research question

  • Were standardized statewide entrance and exit procedures, introduced to Title III under ESSA, associated with more consistent application of these procedures across districts within states?
  • Did standardized classification policies set by states have an impact on the academic achievement and attainment outcomes of EL students compared to similar students not identified for EL status? How much did impacts vary across students with different characteristics, such as home language or enrollment in different language instruction educational programs?
  • Did standardized reclassification policies set by states have an impact on the academic achievement and attainment outcomes of former EL students compared to students who remain ELs? How much did impacts vary across students with different characteristics, such as home language or initial proficiency in English?
  • What criteria did states have for classification and reclassification? What instructional settings, programs, and services did districts and schools offer to students? What was the relationship between these state, district, and school practices and the impacts of classification and reclassification on student outcomes?

Structured Abstract

Design

This study would have described state and district classification and reclassification policies and used a regression discontinuity design (RDD) to assess how these policies affect students' instructional experiences and outcomes. The RDD analysis would have relied on student-level educational data from up to 30 states' longitudinal data systems (SLDS), representing more than 90 percent of ELs in the U.S. The RDD approach would have compared students within each included district whose performance was just high enough to reclassify out of EL status with students in the district whose performance was just under the reclassification threshold. Similarly for analyses of initial classification, the RDD approach would have compared students who just met the criteria for identification as an EL with students whose English proficiency was tested but who were not identified as an EL. The descriptive analysis would have been based on existing information on state classification and reclassification policies and district and school surveys of local policies affecting ELs.

People and institutions involved

IES program contact(s)

Tracy Rimdzius

Education Research Analyst
K-12 Studies

Products and publications

The contract for this study was canceled in February 2025. NCEE is evaluating what publications, if any, may arise from this work.

Questions about this project?

To answer additional questions about this project or provide feedback, please contact the program officer.

 

Tags

English Learners (EL)

Share

Icon to link to Facebook social media siteIcon to link to X social media siteIcon to link to LinkedIn social media siteIcon to copy link value

Questions about this project?

To answer additional questions about this project or provide feedback, please contact the program officer.

 

You may also like

Zoomed in IES logo
Blog

Happy New Year from the ECLS-K: 2024!

January 07, 2025 by Jill McCarroll
Read More
Zoomed in IES logo
Fact Sheet/Infographic/FAQ

Indigenous Students and Languages in the REL South...

Read More
Zoomed in IES logo
Video

Write to Succeed: Improving English Learner Litera...

Read More
icon-dot-govicon-https icon-quote