Project Activities
Research question
- Were standardized statewide entrance and exit procedures, introduced to Title III under ESSA, associated with more consistent application of these procedures across districts within states?
- Did standardized classification policies set by states have an impact on the academic achievement and attainment outcomes of EL students compared to similar students not identified for EL status? How much did impacts vary across students with different characteristics, such as home language or enrollment in different language instruction educational programs?
- Did standardized reclassification policies set by states have an impact on the academic achievement and attainment outcomes of former EL students compared to students who remain ELs? How much did impacts vary across students with different characteristics, such as home language or initial proficiency in English?
- What criteria did states have for classification and reclassification? What instructional settings, programs, and services did districts and schools offer to students? What was the relationship between these state, district, and school practices and the impacts of classification and reclassification on student outcomes?
Structured Abstract
Design
This study would have described state and district classification and reclassification policies and used a regression discontinuity design (RDD) to assess how these policies affect students' instructional experiences and outcomes. The RDD analysis would have relied on student-level educational data from up to 30 states' longitudinal data systems (SLDS), representing more than 90 percent of ELs in the U.S. The RDD approach would have compared students within each included district whose performance was just high enough to reclassify out of EL status with students in the district whose performance was just under the reclassification threshold. Similarly for analyses of initial classification, the RDD approach would have compared students who just met the criteria for identification as an EL with students whose English proficiency was tested but who were not identified as an EL. The descriptive analysis would have been based on existing information on state classification and reclassification policies and district and school surveys of local policies affecting ELs.
People and institutions involved
IES program contact(s)
Products and publications
The contract for this study was canceled in February 2025. NCEE is evaluating what publications, if any, may arise from this work.
Questions about this project?
To answer additional questions about this project or provide feedback, please contact the program officer.