Skip to main content

Breadcrumb

Home arrow_forward_ios Evaluations arrow_forward_ios Study of Post-Pandemic Federal Acco ...
Home arrow_forward_ios ... arrow_forward_ios Study of Post-Pandemic Federal Acco ...
Evaluations
Contract Open

Study of Post-Pandemic Federal Accountability and Key Drivers of Identification of Low-Performing Schools

NCEE Evaluation Division K-12 Studies
Program: Elementary and Secondary Education Act
Award amount: $1,628,377
Awardee:
American Institutes for Research (AIR), edCount
Year: 2024
Duration: 2 years 3 months (09/15/2024 - 12/15/2026)
Project type:
Implementation Study
Contract number: 91990021D0003/ 91990024F0368

Background

Federal law has long required states to identify and support their low-performing schools, with the goal of ensuring that all students have access to a high-quality education. The Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) sought to address several perceived shortcomings of its predecessor, the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB), including a reliance on a limited range of measures and prescriptive methods for evaluating school performance. Specifically, ESSA expanded accountability measures beyond test scores in reading and math and granted states substantial flexibility in determining how to define and measure school performance. Building off another IES study that examines how many and what types of schools were identified for Comprehensive Support and Improvement (CSI) immediately following the passage of ESSA and after the restart to accountability following the pandemic in 2022-23, this study will more closely examine each state's accountability system to assess whether specific measures of performance are driving which schools get identified for CSI status. The result will provide a national picture of the ways in which states' design decisions may or may not have led to the kind of accountability systems that policymakers expected, and whether there were any unintended consequences for equity, which is of particular interest following the pandemic.

Project Activities

Research question

  • To what extent do states leverage flexibility in the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) to create accountability systems that incorporate broader measures beyond only reading and math, are customized to individual state context, and include as many students and schools as possible while maintaining ESSA's required emphasis on academic performance?
  • Does ESSA's push for inclusion of a broader set of measures and states' decisions regarding the combination of those measures provide a more comprehensive picture of school performance as intended, or would simpler accountability systems with fewer measures identify the same set of schools as CSI? Which measures are most influential in the identification of CSI schools?

Structured Abstract

Design

This descriptive study will assess to what extent state accountability system measures and the methods for combining those measures across all states during 2022–23 reflect ESSA's flexibility in terms of broader and more customized accountability systems that include as many students and schools as possible. The study will also assess which accountability system measures are most influential in the identification of lowest-performing schools in each state by simulating how changes in the measures or methods for combining those measures might result in different types of schools being identified as lowest-performing. This analysis will inform whether accountability systems under ESSA resulted in the identification of different sets of lowest-performing schools that would be identified under simpler accountability systems with fewer measures, and if so, what aspects of policy under ESSA may have led to those differences. The study draws on existing data, such as publicly-available state-level data on accountability systems and school-level data on identification of lowest-performing schools on state websites, in state ESSA plans, and from accountability data submitted by states to the Department. In cases where any of the data is missing or unclear, information will be collected directly from states.

Key findings

Key findings will be available after the study report is published.

People and institutions involved

IES program contact(s)

Erica Johnson

Education Research Analyst
K-12 Studies

Products and publications

The study report is expected in 2026 and will be announced on the NCEE page.

Questions about this project?

To answer additional questions about this project or provide feedback, please contact the program officer.

 

Tags

Covid-19

Share

Icon to link to Facebook social media siteIcon to link to X social media siteIcon to link to LinkedIn social media siteIcon to copy link value

Questions about this project?

To answer additional questions about this project or provide feedback, please contact the program officer.

 

You may also like

Zoomed in IES logo
Blog

Using Simulation Technology to Teach Complex Probl...

October 18, 2024 by Emma Hoppough
Read More
Blue zoomed in IES logo
Other Resource

Resource Guide for Supporting Technology in Educat...

Read More
Zoomed in IES logo
Blog

Reimagining for a Rural Context: Washington's Rura...

July 12, 2024 by Steven Tedeschi
Read More
icon-dot-govicon-https icon-quote