Skip to main content

Breadcrumb

Home arrow_forward_ios Resource Librar ... arrow_forward_ios Relationship be ...
Home arrow_forward_ios ... arrow_forward_ios Relationship be ...
Resource Librar ...
Report Descriptive Study

Relationship between State Annual School Monitoring Indicators and Outcomes in Massachusetts Low-Performing Schools

REL Northeast & Islands
Author(s):
Jingtong Pan,
Jill Walston,
Susan Therriault
Publication date:
May 2021
Publication number:
REL 2021-085

Summary

The Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education supports low-performing schools through a process that draws on qualitative and quantitative data from monitoring visits. The data are used to produce ratings for 26 turnaround indicators in four turnaround practice areas relating to school leadership, instructional practices, student supports, and school climate. This study analyzed data on school indicator ratings collected during school years 2014/15-2018/19 from 91 low-performing schools, with a focus on the distribution of the ratings among schools during their first year in the monitoring system and on the relationship of ratings to school outcomes. During the first year in which ratings data were available for a school, a majority of schools were in the two highest rating levels for 21 of the 26 indicators. Schools generally had lower rating levels for indicators in the student supports practice area than in the other three practice areas. Ratings for half the indicators were statistically significantly related to better schoolwide student outcomes and had a practically meaningful effect size of .25 or greater, and none was statistically significantly related to worse outcomes. Two indicators in the leadership practice area (school leaders' high expectations for students and staff and trusting relationships among staff) were related to lower chronic absenteeism rates. Ratings for five indicators in the instructional practices area were related to higher student academic growth in English language arts or math; two of these indicators (use of student assessment data to inform classroom instruction and school structures for instructional improvements) were related to higher growth in both English language arts and math. Ratings for four indicators in the student supports practice area (teacher training to identify student needs, research-based interventions for all students, interventions for English learner students, and interventions for students with disabilities) were related to higher student academic growth in English language arts or math. Two indicators in the school climate practice area (schoolwide behavior plans and adult-student relationships) were related to higher student academic growth in English language arts or math or lower chronic absenteeism rate. Eight indicators were not statistically related to any of the outcomes of interest.

Download, view, and print

Descriptive Study
REL Northeast & Islands

Relationship between State Annual School Monitoring Indicators and Outcomes in Massachusetts Low-Performing Schools

By: Jingtong Pan, Jill Walston, Susan Therriault
Download and view this document Snapshot Brief Appendices

Share

Icon to link to Facebook social media siteIcon to link to X social media siteIcon to link to LinkedIn social media siteIcon to copy link value

Tags

Academic Achievement, Disabilities, English Learners (EL), Mathematics, Reading

You may also like

Zoomed in IES logo
Fact Sheet/Infographic/FAQ

Decoding Complex Multisyllabic Words: Two Instruct...

Author(s): Mary Jo Taylor
Read More
Zoomed in IES logo
Snapshot

Expanding the Reach of the Full-Service Community ...

Author(s): National Center for Education Evaluation (NCEE)
Read More
Zoomed in IES logo
News

Updated Study Review Protocol and new study review...

February 05, 2026 by
Read More
icon-dot-govicon-https icon-quote