Skip to main content

Breadcrumb

Home arrow_forward_ios Resource Library Search arrow_forward_ios Middle School Mathematics Professio ...
Home arrow_forward_ios ... arrow_forward_ios Middle School Mathematics Professio ...
Resource Library Search
Report Evaluation Report

Middle School Mathematics Professional Development Impact Study: Findings After the First Year of Implementation

NCEE
Author(s):
Michael S. Garet, Andrew J. Wayne, Fran Stancavage, James Taylor, Kirk Walters, Mengli Song, Seth Brown, and Steven Hurlburt: American Institutes for Research. Pei Zhu, Susan Sepanik, and Fred Doolittle: MDRC
Publication date:
April 2010
Publication number:
NCEE 20104009

Summary

Results after one year of providing teachers math professional development (PD) indicate no improvement on their students' math achievement when compared to teachers who did not receive the study-provided PD. The Middle School Mathematics Professional Development Impact Study: Findings After the First Year of Implementation included 77 schools in 12 districts in 2007-2008. The PD, although purposely designed to be relevant to the curricula that teachers were using in their classrooms, focused primarily on developing teachers' capability to teach positive rational number topics effectively. America's Choice and Pearson Achievement Solutions were the two professional development providers, each operating in half the districts. Teachers who taught the core 7th grade mathematics class in the study schools were assigned by lottery to either receive the professional development or not. Teachers in all of the study schools continued to be eligible for district-provided PD.

Other key findings include:
  • Professional development for the teachers produced no statistically significant impact on their students' achievement in the areas covered by the training-ratio, proportion, fractions, percentages, decimals.
  • The training did have a statistically significant impact on one of three measures of teacher practice--"frequency with which teachers engaged in activities that elicited student thinking."
  • The training did not have a statistically significant impact on measured teacher knowledge.
  • The study's program was implemented as intended and on average resulted in an additional 55 hours of math professional development during the 2007-08 school year.

Download, view, and print

Evaluation Report
NCEE

Middle School Mathematics Professional Development Impact Study: Findings After the First Year of Implementation

By: Michael S. Garet, Andrew J. Wayne, Fran Stancavage, James Taylor, Kirk Walters, Mengli Song, Seth Brown, and Steven Hurlburt: American Institutes for Research. Pei Zhu, Susan Sepanik, and Fred Doolittle: MDRC
Download and view this document 20104010.pdf

Share

Icon to link to Facebook social media siteIcon to link to X social media siteIcon to link to LinkedIn social media siteIcon to copy link value

Tags

Mathematics, K-12 Education

You may also like

Blue zoomed in IES logo
News

IES Releases the Forum Guide to Student Mobility D...

October 28, 2025 by
Read More
Zoomed in IES logo
Forum Guide

Forum Guide to Student Mobility Data

Author(s): National Center for Education Statistics (NCES)
Publication number: NFES 2026001
Read More
Zoomed in IES logo
Snapshot

Laying the Foundation: Progress on Early Full-Serv...

Author(s): National Center for Education Evaluation (NCEE)
Publication number: NCEE 2026001
Read More
icon-dot-govicon-https icon-quote