Skip to main content

Breadcrumb

Home arrow_forward_ios Resource Library Search arrow_forward_ios Fourth-Grade Students Reading Aloud ...
Home arrow_forward_ios ... arrow_forward_ios Fourth-Grade Students Reading Aloud ...
Resource Library Search
Report Statistical Analysis Report

Fourth-Grade Students Reading Aloud: NAEP 2002 Special Study of Oral Reading

NCES
Author(s):
Mary C. Daane, Jay R. Campbell, Wendy S. Grigg, Madeline J. Goodman, and Andreas Oranje
Publication date:
October 2005
Survey areas:
NAEP - National Assessment of Educational Progress
Publication number:
NCES 2006469

Summary

This report discusses findings about fourth-grade students' oral reading from a special study that was part of the 2002 National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) reading assessment. The data were derived from a nationally representative subsample of students who participated in the 2002 main NAEP reading assessment. The results suggest that the three separate components of oral reading ability—accuracy, rate, and fluency—are very much related to each other and to reading comprehension, as measured by the main NAEP assessment. “Fluent” readers in this study were likely to read higher percentages of words accurately, to read the passage at a faster rate, and to have scored higher, on average, on the NAEP reading assessment than “nonfluent” readers. More than one-half of the students read the study passage fluently, with a fairly high degree of accuracy, and at a rate of at least 105 words per minute. However, a group of students whose average scale score and labored oral reading performance suggested they were struggling also demonstrated, on average, the lowest performance on measures of accuracy, rate, and fluency. Students' self-correction of their oral reading errors was found to be somewhat dependent upon whether or not those errors resulted in meaning change. Further, students who self-corrected greater proportions of all errors (meaning-change and non-meaning-change) also showed a higher average scale score. Results for student groups defined by gender and race/ethnicity reflected the outcomes for the entire subsample; i.e., student groups with higher average reading scores were more likely to demonstrate, on average, higher performance in measures of accuracy, rate, and fluency.

Online Availability

  • Browse the Executive Summary of this report.
  • Download, view and print the report as a pdf file.

Share

Icon to link to Facebook social media siteIcon to link to X social media siteIcon to link to LinkedIn social media siteIcon to copy link value

Tags

Academic Achievement

You may also like

Zoomed in IES logo
Workshop/Training

Meta-Analysis Training Institute (MATI)

July 28, 2025
Read More
Rectangle Blue 1 Pattern 1
Workshop/Training

Summer Research Training Institute on Cluster-Rand...

July 14, 2025
Read More
Zoomed in IES logo
Workshop/Training

Data Science for Education (DS4EDU)

April 01, 2025
Read More
icon-dot-govicon-https icon-quote