WWC review of this study

Enhancing the Interpretive Reading and Analytical Writing of Mainstreamed English Learners in Secondary School: Results from a Randomized Field Trial Using a Cognitive Strategies Approach

Olson, Carol Booth; Kim, James S.; Scarcella, Robin; Kramer, Jason; Pearson, Matthew; van Dyk, David A.; Collins, Penny; Land, Robert E. (2012). American Educational Research Journal, v49 n2 p323-355 Apr 2012. Retrieved from: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ960494

  • Randomized controlled trial
     examining 
    1,671
     Students
    , grades
    6-12

Reviewed: January 2024



Evidence Tier rating based solely on this study. This intervention may achieve a higher tier when combined with the full body of evidence.

Study sample characteristics were not reported.

Reviewed: December 2019



Evidence Tier rating based solely on this study. This intervention may achieve a higher tier when combined with the full body of evidence.

Study sample characteristics were not reported.

Reviewed: February 2014

At least one statistically significant positive finding
Meets WWC standards with reservations
English language arts achievement outcomes—Indeterminate effect found for the domain
Outcome
measure
Comparison Period Sample Intervention
mean
Comparison
mean
Significant? Improvement
    index
Evidence
tier

California Standards Test (CST): English Language Arts

Pathway Project vs. Another intervention

Year 2

Full sample;
1,671 students

333.08

327.03

No

--
Reading achievement outcomes—Statistically significant positive effect found for the domain
Outcome
measure
Comparison Period Sample Intervention
mean
Comparison
mean
Significant? Improvement
    index
Evidence
tier

California Standards Test (CST): Readng

Pathway Project vs. Another intervention

Year 2

Full sample;
1,669 students

24.39

23.48

No

 
 
1
Writing achievement outcomes—Statistically significant positive effect found for the domain
Outcome
measure
Comparison Period Sample Intervention
mean
Comparison
mean
Significant? Improvement
    index
Evidence
tier

Assessment of Literary Analysis (ALA)

Pathway Project vs. Another intervention

Year 2

Full sample;
1,133 students

6.71

5.68

Yes

 
 
19

California Standards Test (CST): Writing

Pathway Project vs. Another intervention

Year 2

Full sample;
1,670 students

19.59

18.26

Yes

 
 
7


Evidence Tier rating based solely on this study. This intervention may achieve a higher tier when combined with the full body of evidence.

Characteristics of study sample as reported by study author.


  • 100% English language learners

  • Female: 51%
    Male: 49%

  • Urban
    • B
    • A
    • C
    • D
    • E
    • F
    • G
    • I
    • H
    • J
    • K
    • L
    • P
    • M
    • N
    • O
    • Q
    • R
    • S
    • V
    • U
    • T
    • W
    • X
    • Z
    • Y
    • a
    • h
    • i
    • b
    • d
    • e
    • f
    • c
    • g
    • j
    • k
    • l
    • m
    • n
    • o
    • p
    • q
    • r
    • s
    • t
    • u
    • x
    • w
    • y

    California
  • Ethnicity
    Hispanic    
    95%
    Not Hispanic or Latino    
    5%
 

Your export should download shortly as a zip archive.

This download will include data files for study and findings review data and a data dictionary.

Connect With the WWC

loading
back to top