WWC review of this study

Making the Transition: Interim Results of the National Guard Youth ChalleNGe Evaluation

Millenky, Megan; Bloom, Dan; Dillon, Colleen (2010). MDRC. Retrieved from: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED514652

  • Randomized Controlled Trial
    , grades

Reviewed: September 2010

At least one finding shows promising evidence of effectiveness
At least one statistically significant positive finding
Meets WWC standards without reservations
Completing school outcomes—Statistically significant positive effect found for the domain
Comparison Period Sample Intervention
Significant? Improvement

Earned a diploma or GED certificate

National Guard Youth ChalleNGe Program vs. Business as usual


survey respondents;
1,196 students





Evidence Tier rating based solely on this study. This intervention may achieve a higher tier when combined with the full body of evidence.

Characteristics of study sample as reported by study author.

  • Female: 16%
    Male: 84%
    • B
    • A
    • C
    • D
    • E
    • F
    • G
    • I
    • H
    • J
    • K
    • L
    • P
    • M
    • N
    • O
    • Q
    • R
    • S
    • V
    • U
    • T
    • W
    • X
    • Z
    • Y
    • a
    • h
    • i
    • b
    • d
    • e
    • f
    • c
    • g
    • j
    • k
    • l
    • m
    • n
    • o
    • p
    • q
    • r
    • s
    • t
    • u
    • x
    • w
    • y

    California, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Michigan, Mississippi, North Carolina, New Mexico, Texas, Wisconsin
  • Race
    Other or unknown
  • Ethnicity
    Not Hispanic or Latino    


The study took place in 10 sites in California, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Michigan, Mississippi, New Mexico, North Carolina, Texas, and Wisconsin.

Study sample

Between 2005 and 2007, a total of 3,074 high school dropouts between the ages of 16 and 18 were randomly assigned to the National Guard Youth ChalleNGe Program in 10 states; 2,320 to the intervention group and 754 to the control group. There was a single site in each state. A random subsample of 1,508 participants (916 in the intervention group and 592 in the control group) was selected to be given the 21-month follow-up survey. The analysis sample included 1,196 youths (736 in the intervention group and 460 in the control group) who responded to the follow-up survey; 80% of the intervention group and 78% of the control group responded to the survey.Most sample members (84%) were male. They ranged in age from 16 to 18 years old at program entry. The sample was racially and ethnically diverse: 41% were Caucasian; 40% were African-American; 14% were Hispanic; and 5% were from other racial and ethnic groups. Sample members had performed poorly in school before entering the program. About half reported receiving mostly Ds and Fs before dropping out.

Intervention Group

The National Guard Youth ChalleNGe Program attempts to promote positive youth development for high school dropouts through a residential education and training program followed by a structured mentoring program. The intervention consisted of three phases.Phase 1: Two weeks of program orientation and physical and psychological assessment in a residential, quasi-military setting. Phase 2: Twenty weeks of education and training in a residential, quasi-military setting. During this phase, the majority of participants’ time was spent on educational activi-ties, including work toward a GED or high school diploma. Education and training covered the following eight areas: leadership, responsible citizenship, service to community, life-coping skills, physical fitness, health and hygiene, job skills, and academic excellence. Phase 3: One year postresidential phase. Participants worked with program staff to arrange a postresidential placement in employment, continued education, or military service. In addition to participating in the placement activity, each participant was supposed to maintain monthly contact with a mentor, who was chosen by the participant and trained by ChalleNGe program staff.

Comparison Group

Control group members were not eligible to receive National Guard Youth ChalleNGe Program services but could receive other services available in the community. Contrary to the study design, eight control group members enrolled in the program (1% of the full control group). These enrollees were still assigned to the control group in all analyses.

Outcome descriptions

The relevant study outcome included in this review is whether students earned a high school diploma or GED, based on student follow-up interviews. For a more detailed description of this outcome measure, see Appendix A2. The study also examined a number of other outcomes that are not within the scope of the Dropout Prevention protocol.

Support for implementation

Program staff included team leaders who directly supervised the students, teachers who provided classroom instruction, and counselors who provided individual, group, and career counseling. It was common for staff members, particularly team leaders, to be National Guard members or to have military experience. Teachers often came to the program from the local school district or from community colleges. Counselors typically had bachelor’s or advanced degrees in psychology, social work, or other relevant fields.

In the case of multiple manuscripts that report on one study, the WWC selects one manuscript as the primary citation and lists other manuscripts that describe the study as additional sources.

  • Bloom, Dan; Gardenhire-Crooks, Alissa; Mandsager, Conrad. (2009). Reengaging High School Dropouts: Early Results of the National Guard Youth ChalleNGe Program Evaluation. Full Report. MDRC.


Your export should download shortly as a zip archive.

This download will include data files for study and findings review data and a data dictionary.

Connect With the WWC

back to top