Study: 89882

Single Study Review

Review Details

Reviewed: April 2021

No statistically significant positive
findings

Meets WWC standards without reservations

For:

Single Study Review (findings for Transition Lessons)

Using:

Rating:

Meets WWC standards without reservations because it is a randomized controlled trial with low attrition.

This review may not reflect the full body of research evidence for this intervention.

Evidence Tier rating based solely on this study. This intervention may achieve a higher tier when combined with the full body of evidence.

Findings

Alphabetics outcomes—Indeterminate effect found for the domain
Outcome measure	Comparison	Period	Sample	Intervention mean	Comparison mean	Significant?	Improvement index	Evidence tier
Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (DIBELS): Nonsense Words Fluency subtest	Transition Lessons vs. Business as usual	0 Days	Full sample; 78 students	70.85	68.26	No	--
Stanford Achievement Test (10th Edition), word reading subtest	Transition Lessons vs. Business as usual	0 Days	Full sample; 78 students	487.75	491.56	No	--

English language proficiency outcomes—Indeterminate effect found for the domain
Outcome measure	Comparison	Period	Sample	Intervention mean	Comparison mean	Significant?	Improvement index	Evidence tier
Group Reading Assessment and Diagnostic Evaluation (GRADE): Listening Comprehension subtest	Transition Lessons vs. Business as usual	0 Days	Full sample; 78 students	13.77	13.72	No	--
Group Reading Assessment and Diagnostic Evaluation (GRADE): Word meaning subtest	Transition Lessons vs. Business as usual	0 Days	Full sample; 78 students	21.69	22.31	No	--

General Literacy Achievement outcomes—Statistically significant negative effect found for the domain
Outcome measure	Comparison	Period	Sample	Intervention mean	Comparison mean	Significant?	Improvement index	Evidence tier
Stanford Achievement Test (10th Edition), sentence reading subtest	Transition Lessons vs. Business as usual	0 Days	Full sample; 78 students	504.24	521.72	Yes	-18

Reading Fluency outcomes—Indeterminate effect found for the domain
Outcome measure	Comparison	Period	Sample	Intervention mean	Comparison mean	Significant?	Improvement index	Evidence tier
Dynamic Indicators for Basic Early Literacy Skills (DIBELS): Oral Reading Fluency (ORF)	Transition Lessons vs. Business as usual	0 Days	Full sample; 78 students	36.66	39.00	No	--

Evidence Tier rating based solely on this study. This intervention may achieve a higher tier when combined with the full body of evidence.

Sample Characteristics

Characteristics of study sample as reported by study author.

100% English language learners
Female: 42%
Male: 58%
- B
- A
- C
- D
- E
- F
- G
- I
- H
- J
- K
- L
- P
- M
- N
- O
- Q
- R
- S
- V
- U
- T
- W
- X
- Z
- Y
- a
- h
- i
- b
- d
- e
- f
- c
- g
- j
- k
- l
- m
- n
- o
- p
- q
- r
- s
- t
- u
- v
- x
- w
- y
West

Race
Other or unknown		100%

Ethnicity
Hispanic		100%

Study Details

Setting

The study was conducted in seven schools in the Pacific Northwest. All schools received Title I services.

Study sample

The study sample consisted of 78 Spanish-speaking English learners in first grade who were identified as struggling readers, with 39 in the intervention group and 39 in the comparison group. All students were of Hispanic origin and were native Spanish speakers. Students' average age at the beginning of the study was 6.5 years and 42 percent were female. All students were eligible to receive Title I services. The study randomly assigned students to conditions.

Intervention Group

Students in the intervention condition received small group instruction aimed at supporting the transition of students from bilingual instruction in the first grade to English-only instruction in the second grade. The supplemental instruction focused on helping students understand which features of the Spanish language are transferable to English, decoding skills (including phonemic awareness, letter-sound knowledge, and word and sentence reading) and English language proficiency. The intervention was implemented after school in three schools and in small group sessions during the school day in the other four schools. All sessions were conducted in addition to students’ standard reading instruction. Each session was led by a bilingual teacher or an instructional assistant. The 30-minute sessions occurred 5 days a week for 12 weeks.

Comparison Group

The comparison condition received business-as-usual instruction, which varied across schools. Teachers at three schools used the Houghton Mifflin core reading curriculum along with supplemental materials for English language learners, such as leveled reading books to build vocabulary. Teachers at two schools used the Fast Track Phonics program (Wiley, 2001). At the remaining two schools, one teacher used the DISTAR program (Adams & Engelmann, 1996) and the other teacher used the Harcourt intervention program (Trophies, 2005). Students in the comparison condition received the same amount of reading instruction per day as students in the intervention condition.

Support for implementation

A member of the research team trained three teachers and 11 instructional assistants to implement the transition lessons prior to the beginning of the study. This training lasted for 7 hours during one day and focused on the intervention lesson plans, effective pacing, and explicit instruction. Teachers were first introduced to the lesson content and structure, then observed a model lesson and practiced each component of the lesson. The training highlighted the importance of teaching vocabulary and academic language for English learners.

Does Supplemental Instruction Support the Transition from Spanish to English Reading Instruction for First-Grade English Learners at Risk of Reading Difficulties?