Skip Navigation
Funding Opportunities | Search Funded Research Grants and Contracts

IES Grant

Title: The Development and Validation of an Assessment Instrument to Study the Progression of Understanding of Ideas about Energy from Elementary School through High School
Center: NCER Year: 2012
Principal Investigator: Herrmann Abell, Cari Awardee: American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
Program: Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Education      [Program Details]
Award Period: 4 years (3/1/2012-2/29/2016) Award Amount: $1,598,086
Goal: Measurement Award Number: R305A120138
Description:

Co-Principal Investigator: George DeBoer

Purpose: Energy is a key topic in science with many applications to earth, physical, and life science, as well as to engineering and technology. Therefore, it is important to have high quality assessments focusing on energy to determine what students do and do not know about the topic and how those ideas develop across grade levels. The purpose of this project is to develop and validate a set of three assessment instruments to monitor how students progress in their understanding of important ideas about energy from late elementary school through high school.

Project: The researchers will develop and validate three vertically aligned forms of an assessment instrument focusing on the topic of energy. In addition, the researchers will explore the progression of students' understanding of energy from late elementary through high school using the assessment. Supporting teacher materials will also be developed including descriptions of the targeted knowledge, summaries of student misconceptions about the targeted knowledge, psychometric properties of the assessment items, and guidelines using the instrument and interpretation of results.

Products: Products include three fully developed and validated vertically aligned forms of the multiple choice assessment instrument and supporting materials for use in late elementary through high school. Peer-reviewed publications will also be produced.

Structured Abstract

Setting: The study will be conducted in elementary, middle, and high schools from urban, rural, and suburban areas across the United States.

Sample: The study will consist of a diverse, national sample of teachers and students from grades 4 through 12. The initial versions of the instrument will be pilot tested with approximately 3,000 students from120 classrooms. Once the finalized instrument is developed, it will then be administered to approximately 12,000 students from 480 classrooms.

Assessment: Each of the three forms of the assessment—one for late elementary grades (i.e., Grades 4 and 5), one for middle school, and one for high school—will include 35 multiple choice items and will be developed to provide a comprehensive measure of students' understanding of energy. The forms will be linked by overlapping items and by common conceptual themes that run through the three forms. The instruments will build on and extend the existing knowledge base in energy assessment by: (1) covering a more extensive and coherent set of important energy concepts than existing instruments; (2) testing for the correct scientific understanding and probing for common student misconceptions; (3) testing learning progressions through the energy topic; (4) making the instrument available in both paper-based and online formats; and (5) providing supporting teacher materials that will guide the interpretation of classroom- and student-level results.

Research Design and Methods: Four steps will be taken to develop and validate the instrument. First, the researchers will thoroughly describe the content domain that the instrument will assess and write clarification statements that unpack national content standards related to energy including those from the College Board, the National Research Council, and Achieve, Inc., to make explicit the boundaries around the knowledge being targeted. Second, an instrument item pool of 400 items will be developed. Once the item pool has been created, the third step is to pilot test the initial version of the instrument in 120 classrooms on a sample of approximately 1,000 students for each assessment form (3,000 students in all). The online version of the instrument will be administered to half of the students and the paper version will be administered to the other half. Once the instrument is revised and finalized, it will then be administered to a large national sample of late elementary, middle, and high school students in 480 classrooms with approximately 4,000 students for each assessment form (12,000 students in all). Teachers will be recruited through e-mail listservs to participate with their students. Teachers will be accepted into the study on a first-come, first-served basis, although the researchers will adjust the selection if necessary to achieve representation from urban, rural, and suburban schools from different parts of the country. Half the sample will use the online version, and the other half will use the paper version. These data will be used to examine the usability and validity of the online version of the assessment compared to paper-and-pencil versions, and to examine the progression of students' understanding of ideas about energy across grade levels.

Control Condition: Due to the nature of this research design, there is no control condition.

Key Measures: The key measures for the study include students' written responses to questions about pilot test items, students' responses during the Interviews about Instances and Events measure, students' answer choice selection during pilot and field tests of the assessment instrument, and teachers' feedback on the supporting materials.

Data Analytic Strategy: Qualitative analyses of students' written comments, interview responses, and Rasch modeling, will be used to construct and validate the three forms of the assessment and ensure the comparability of the online and paper-based versions of the assessment. Differential Item and Test Functioning Analysis will also be conducted to determine if any items or tests are sensitive to gender or English language learners.

Publications

Book chapter

Herrmann-Abell, C.F., and DeBoer, G.E. (2014). Developing and Using Distractor-Driven Multiple-Choice Assessments Aligned to Ideas About Energy Forms, Transformation, Transfer, and Conservation. In R.F. Chen, A. Eisenkraft, D. Fortus, J. Krajcik, K. Neumann, J.C. Nordine, and A. Scheff (Eds.), Teaching and Learning of Energy in K‐12 Education (pp. 103–133). New York: Springer.

Journal article, monograph, or newsletter

Herrmann-Abell, C.F., and DeBoer, G.E. (2017). Investigating a Learning Progression for Energy Ideas from Upper Elementary Through High School. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55 : 68–93. doi:10.1002/tea.21411


Back