What are the evidence-based practices connected to instructional coaching?
Response:
Thank you for the question you submitted to our REL Reference Desk regarding the
evidence-based practices connected to instructional coaching. We have prepared the following
memo with research references to help answer your question. For each reference, we provide an
abstract, excerpt, or summary written by the study’s author or publisher. The references are
selected from the most commonly used research resources and may not be comprehensive.
References are listed in alphabetical order, not necessarily in order of relevance. Other relevant
studies may exist. We have not evaluated the quality of these references, but provide them for
your information only.
Research References
Desimone, L. M. & Pak, K. (2017). Instructional coaching as high-quality professional
development. Theory Into Practice, 56(1), 3-12. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1129817 Request full text available at
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/311978475 From the abstract: “In response to policy initiatives calling for the implementation of
evidence-based classroom practice, instructional coaches are frequently utilized as
providers of professional development (PD). Despite the demand for instructional
coaches, there is little empirical evidence that coaching improves teacher practice. We
address this limitation by conceptualizing instructional coaching within a research-based
framework for PD consisting of 5 key features synthesized from cross-sectional studies,
longitudinal studies, and literature reviews of experimental and quasi-experimental
studies: content focus, active learning, sustained duration, coherence, and collective
participation. When examining understanding instructional coaching through the lens of
the 5 empirically predictive elements of effective PD, the model presents itself as a
powerful tool for improving teacher knowledge, skills, and practice. It is imperative that
future researchers define the next set of questions to further refine the understanding of
coaching and how it can and should be executed to leverage professional learning.”
Gibbons, L. K. & Cobb, P. (2017). Focusing on teacher learning opportunities to identify
potentially productive coaching activities. Journal of Teacher Education, 68(4), 411-425. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1151178 From the abstract: “Instructional improvement initiatives in many districts include
instructional coaching as a primary form of job-embedded support for teachers. However,
the coaching literature provides little guidance about what activities coaches should
engage in with teachers to improve instruction. When researchers do propose activities,
they rarely justify why those activities might support teacher learning. Drawing on the
preservice and inservice teacher education literatures, we present a conceptual analysis of
learning activities that have the potential to support mathematics and science teachers to
improve practice. We argue that our analysis can inform research on mathematics and
science coaching, coaching policies, and the design of professional learning for coaches.”
Glover, T. A., Reddy, L. A., Kurz, A., & Elliott, S. N. (2019). Use of an online platform to
facilitate and investigate data-driven instructional coaching. Assessment for Effective
Intervention, 44(2), 95-103.
Retrieved from: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1206311 Full text available at
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1534508418811593 From the abstract: “This article presents theoretical and empirical support for a data-driven
instructional coaching approach and emerging evidence for the contributions of an
online platform in operationalizing, assessing, and facilitating the implementation of key
coaching actions for both research and practice. The contributions of an online platform in
guiding the implementation and investigation of key coaching actions (i.e., modeling,
facilitation of practice, and feedback) throughout a five-phase coaching sequence are
presented. The article outlines initial research to demonstrate the utility of the online
platform for advancing an understanding of how coaching actions predict teacher and
student outcomes. This research suggests that there are predictive relationships between
coaching actions and the fidelity of implementation of teacher interventions, reductions in
instructional gaps, and student achievement. The implications of this work for advancing
coaching practices and future empirical investigations are described.”
Gray, J. A. (2018). Leadership coaching and mentoring: A research-based model for
stronger partnerships. International Journal of Education Policy and Leadership, 13(12). Retrieved from: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1200706 From the abstract: “This conceptual article proposes a research-based model for
leadership preparation programs to more effectively prepare, support, and sustain new
school leaders in the field and profession. This study offers a new construct, which
combines the concepts of early field experiences, experiential learning, leadership-focused
coaching, and mentoring support, with university faculty and school district leaders and
mentors working collaboratively to support novice leaders. University faculty would
provide leadership-focused coaching while prospective leaders are completing coursework
and later once they are placed in school leadership positions. Further, school districts
would provide mentoring support by experienced instructional leaders.”
Hammond, L. & Moore, W. M. (2018). Teachers taking up explicit instruction: The
impact of a professional development and directive instructional coaching model. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 43(7), 110-133.
Retrieved from: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1188027 From the abstract: “In this study we measured the impact of a professional development
model that included directive coaching on the instructional practices of Western
Australian primary school teachers taking up explicit instruction. We developed and
validated protocols that enabled us to measure teachers' fidelity to the salient elements of
explicit instruction and interviewed participants about the impact of the coaching program
on student learning, their feelings of self-efficacy and attitudes to being coached.
Numerical scores to indicate teachers' demonstration of explicit instruction lesson design
and delivery components changed positively over the five observed lessons and directive
coaching had a positive impact on teachers' competence and confidence. The elements of
the coaching process that the teachers found valuable were the coach's positive tone, the
detailed written feedback, and the specificity, directness and limited number of the
suggestions. Implications for schools with reform-based agendas wanting to change
teachers' instructional practices through instructional coaching are discussed.”
Hemmeter, M. L., Hardy, J. K., Schnitz, A. G., Adams, J. M., & Kinder, K. A. (2015).
Effects of training and coaching with performance feedback on teachers’ use of "Pyramid
Model" practices. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 35(3), 144-156. Retrieved from: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED577099 From the abstract: “Training and coaching with performance feedback has been effective
for supporting teachers to use evidence-based instructional practices. However, coaching
with performance feedback has primarily been used to support teachers to use discrete
skills, and there has been little evidence of maintenance and generalization. The purpose
of this study was to examine the effects of a professional development intervention on
teachers' implementation of practices related to the "Pyramid Model for Promoting Social-
Emotional Competence in Young Children," as well as the extent to which teachers
generalized and maintained those practices. A multiple probe design across sets of
"Pyramid Model" practices replicated across three teachers was used in this study. All
teachers acquired the practices and maintained the practices after coaching ended. There
was some evidence of generalization for all three teachers. The effects of teacher
implementation on classroom-wide incidences of challenging behavior were mixed.
Teachers all rated the coaching positively.”
Ledford, J. R., Zimmerman, K. N., Harbin, E. R., & Ward, S. E. (2018). Improving the use
of evidence-based instructional practices for paraprofessionals. Focus on Autism and
Other Developmental Disabilities, 33(4), 206-216. Retrieved from: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1199193
Full text available at https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1088357617699178 From the abstract: “Coaching has been shown to improve the use of evidence-based
instructional practices (EBIPs), but relatively few studies have been conducted to assess
the effectiveness of coaching for adults belonging to minority groups and
paraprofessionals in public elementary school settings. In this study, a multiple probe
design across participants was used to assess the effectiveness of coaching and the
provision of feedback on the use of prompting procedures and associated practices for
three adults supporting three young students with autism in a self-contained elementary
school setting. Results showed improved use of target practices and increased student
engagement. More research is needed regarding the training and coaching of teaching
teams and the use of evidence-based coaching and feedback practices to assist
paraprofessionals in implementing EBIPs with small groups of students and in a variety of
educational settings.”
Stefaniak, J. E. (2017). The role of coaching within the context of instructional design. TechTrends: Linking research and practice to improve learning, 61(1), 26-31. Retrieved from: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1125215
Request full text available at https://www.researchgate.net/publication/310503476 From the abstract: “Upon entry into the instructional design workforce, there is a need for
instructional designers to continue to hone their craft and skill development. Often times
novice instructional designers are paired with experts during the onboarding process.
Coaching is utilized to provide novices and those less experienced with the necessary
support they need to enhance their skillset. This article explores the use of coaching in the
professional development of instructional designers. Specific attention is given to
theoretical approaches, models, and contexts related to coaching.”
Sutherland, K. S., Conroy, M. A., Vo, A., & Ladwig, C. (2015). Implementation integrity
of practice-based coaching: Preliminary results from the BEST in CLASS efficacy trial. School Mental Health, 7(1), 21-33. Retrieved from: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED552896 From the abstract: “The purpose of this article is to describe the practice-based coaching
model used in BEST in CLASS, a Tier-2 classroom-based intervention comprised of
evidence-based instructional practices designed to prevent and ameliorate the chronic
problem behaviors of young children at risk for the development of emotional/behavioral
disorders. Following a description of the model, data from year two of an ongoing 4-year
randomized control trial are presented that describe (a) the amount (i.e., dosage) of
coaching teachers received during BEST in CLASS implementation, (b) the integrity with
which coaches implemented the BEST in CLASS coaching model, and (c) subsequent
teacher implementation of the BEST in CLASS strategies. Forty-eight (23 BEST in CLASS; 25 comparison) teachers and ten coaches participated in this descriptive study.
Data indicate that following coaches' observations, teachers received approximately 30
min of practice-based coaching during coaching meetings each week of implementation,
and integrity data indicate that coaches implemented the critical coaching skills during the
coaching meetings with integrity. Adherence data indicate that teachers in the treatment
group increased their extensiveness of the use of BEST in CLASS practices at both posttreatment
and 1-month follow-up compared to comparison teachers; competence data
indicated that teachers in the treatment group increased the quality of delivery of practices
at post-treatment compared to comparison teachers. Implications of these findings for both
future research and practice-based coaching implementation are discussed.”
Thomas, E. E., Bell, D. L., Spelman, M., & Briody, J. (2015). The growth of instructional
coaching partner conversations in a PreK-3rd grade teacher professional development
experience. Journal of Adult Education, 44(2), 1-6. Retrieved from: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1083974 From the abstract: “Instructional coaching that supports teachers' with revising teaching
practices is not understood. This study sought to understand the impact of the instructional
coaching experience by recording coaching conversations/interactions with teachers. The
purpose was to determine if the type of coaching conversations changed overtime during
three defined time periods within a 3-year project. A quantitative design was conducted
using a sample size of 5 faith-based elementary schools. Data was collected using the
Instructional Coaching Scale by Woodruff. The results revealed that instructional
coaching conversations/ interactions changed towards a more interactive style and teachers
became more involved in the coaching experience.”
Additional Organizations to Consult
Edutopia: https://www.edutopia.org/topic/instructional-coaching From the website: “Learn about how teachers can effectively support other teachers in
professional development, sharing best practices, and improving instruction.”
Regional Educational Laboratory (REL) Northeast & Islands: https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs/infographics/pdf/REL_NEI_Instructional_Coaching_for_ELA.pdf From the website: “REL Northeast & Islands searched and reviewed studies to identify
instructional coaching programs, components, and practices that are associated with
student academic outcomes in reading/English language arts (ELA). This document is
intended to support schools and districts in understanding the research and evidence that
exists related to reading/ELA instructional coaching.”
Methods:
Search Strings. Instructional coaching practices OR best instructional coaching OR instructional
coaching evidence OR best practices instructional coaching OR instructional coaching best
practices OR instructional coaching training OR evidence based instructional coaching OR
instructional coaching professional development
Searched Databases and Resources.
ERIC
Academic Databases (e.g., EBSCO databases, JSTOR database, ProQuest, Google Scholar)
Commercial search engines (e.g., Google)
Institute of Education Sciences Resources
Reference Search and Selection Criteria. The following factors are considered when selecting references:
Date of Publication: Priority is given to references published in the past 10 years.
Search Priorities of Reference Sources: ERIC, other academic databases, Institute of Education Sciences Resources, and other resources including general internet searches
Methodology: Priority is given to the most rigorous study types, such as randomized controlled trials and quasi-experimental designs, as well as to correlational designs, descriptive analyses, mixed methods and literature reviews. Other considerations include the target population and sample, including their relevance to the question, generalizability, and general quality.
REL Mid-Atlantic serves the education needs of Delaware, District of Columbia, Maryland, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania.
This Ask A REL was prepared under Contract ED-IES-17-C-0006 by Regional Educational
Laboratory Mid-Atlantic administered by Mathematica Policy Research. The content does not
necessarily reflect the views or policies of IES or the U.S. Department of Education, nor does
mention of trade names, commercial products, or organizations imply endorsement by the U.S.
Government.